The Novel Virus is Not New, But is it Fiction?

OK, let's start here.

A manufactured illusion. Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich 9/7/21 on BrandNewTube. There are now various copies of this on other platforms, such as FB with some extra background info.

"There was no novel Coronavirus. Check of gene sequence vs all patent records showed not novel since 1999! There are 120 patented pieces of evidence showing total fallacy of claim 'novel'!

Powerful stuff, and backed by a 205-page dossier: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

Here is a very handy precis of the doc

Now, here is a great Twitter thread from Kevin McKernan that pours some cold water on some of the claims about some of the patents! This isn't (yet) a court of law, but worth knowing that the armour has some chinks in it.

But the main story may still hold true, that known parties helped and funded the research to create a weaponised version of a known virus and then either willfully or accidentally released it into the world. OK, but...

Here is an interesting document: WHO IS DAVID E. MARTIN?

Now, the doc has been posted anonymously and cannot be downloaded, so hopefully will still be there. So, one has to just read the content, and the main question is: why Martin has come forward now, and whether he is a trustworthy whistleblower or researcher?

This may protect the author from the proliferation of variants, it also means I cannot copy-paste anything from it (and really cannot be bothered to retype large chunks!)

You need to read it yourself, but the whole thrust of Martin's ventures and businesses are steeped in promoting globalist agendas and structures. Never mind the masonic logo! Just in case that article disappears, you can start your own investigations by looking at M-CAM and On The Commons to see the green glow of hive obedience.

One of Dr Martin's key initiatives is to change patent law and part of that is to help some sectors discover that existing expired patents can be used at a fraction of the cost of trying to rediscover them. Sounds good.

David Martin first appeared with Mikki Willis pushing the bioterror angle on the Plandemic II documentary. That some of what he is saying is true, the corruption across agencies and countries to create weaponised forms of the coronavirus family of viruses, will not get any of the protagonists in front of a judge as they are well-protected by other agencies.

So on one level, David Martin is exposing some truths that others may not have had the time to research. But what is the "bigger truth" that serves as an unspoken assumption? The virus-as-bioweapon scenario assumes that there is actually a virus!

This is where I slightly part with the author in that I think the scam is even more subtle. There is a virus (maybe many), and if you own a lab you can even buy a sample. So there are tests around the world on "synthetic samples" of a virus that is alleged to be the cause of the pandemic. That's where the scam kicks in. Every nation that has been forced to reply by some freedom of information act, has stated that they do not have any isolated samples of the virus from a human. How is it possible to blame a virus of which there are zero copies?! The alleged viruses in the wild have all been constructed on a computer - they have not been isolated.

The virus is a construct in the minds of a psychopathic elite that has spread into the minds of a frightened population.

The whole argument of David Martin is that there is no novel coronavirus, in that it was never really new, but the unspoken assumption is that the virus that now has this name is really real and really out in the wild creating fake-positive PCR tests.

One may also think of a "novel" virus as a piece of fiction.

So, going back to David Martin, all that info may help make one case of fraud that will never reach a court, but at the same time it bolsters the real fraud across the whole globe: there is no viral pandemic. A fake non-test generates fake data plugged into an apocalyptic statistical model that can show "cases" going up and down based on how the PCR "test" is manipulated. It is possible to make everybody positive and everybody negative just by instructing each national lab to change the number of cycles used. The inventor of the PCR technique said many times that it is not a diagnostic test. Indeed, how the PCR non-test ever became the "gold standard" is a small part of Martin's dossier - a much longer essay on that issue can be found here.

If this was a real pandemic managed by actual human beings, would we not see millions of autopsies?? Why are autopsies banned? What is there to hide? There were a few done very early on, but that is nowhere near enough. So, to count as a "covid death" all you need is a false-positive test followed by death - that's it. However, if you get a false-positive, followed by a gene-jab and then die, that isn't a "covid death" - that must have been from some phantom pre-existing condition. See the scam?

The problem here is that "the scam" is really many interlocking scams, and like a ratking, they become difficult to prise apart into distinct threads. Is David Martin a genuine whistleblower? Hard to tell given his business interests. Is his information genuine and useful? Yes, there may be some errors but the research, within his parameters, is meticulous. If David Martin is, instead, a limited hangout agent, what could possibly be the deeper secrets being obfuscated? That there is no actual virus in the wild; that all the symptoms are due to other causes, both synthetic and natural.

Remember that SARS was going to be the planned epidemic that never happened; this time, the propaganda was in place to ensure it would happen, whether for real or as a macabre theatre. Without actual evidence from autopsies, there is no evidence that anybody has died from a novel virus. On the subject of evidence, we also need a global and truly random sampling of the gene-jab vials to determine their true content. There is already evidence that not all vials are equal, but it was a small study and will be dismissed under a torrent of abuse from the fact chuckers as they mop up the damage.

Proof - that's science - without proof you have fiction.

Believe nothing - believe nobody.

Without proof, people are being frightened by a grim fairy tale.

You know you live in a psychopathic state because every agency does the opposite of what it was designed to do. Sadly, that assumes a level of human insight that seems to have disappeared.

I understand, science is hard, and truth has died, so all one is left with a parade of lies.

But one should still be able to see what is left unsaid - no autopsies and no random quality checks of the gene-jabs (so-called vaccines). It's really that simple.

Welcome to technocracy.