RE: Wifi Radiation Sickness - Just Say NO!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Wifi Radiation Sickness - Just Say NO!

in health •  3 years ago 

My suspicion is that natural running water, such as a spring or clean river, will do the same thing by itself. Water is weakly ionic, so the turbulent flow will also create magnetic fields - similar to how the blood is ionic and is also flowing with a magnetic field.

So the question for home use is how to simulate this. I haven't seen ice created with magnets around it - that might be fun!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

My other deep suspicion is that one seemingly successful black op is to take such new knowledge and distort it into quackery - and HENCE than call that knowledge fake! Most people are both gullible and ignorant, so that works perfectly to make money, fool people and discredit the original idea.

I recall Becker (Electromagnetic Man book) saying he was always being asked to promote devices that used weak currents to help heal bones. BUT, all such devices were calibrated far too high, so that the body created a defensive response to an aggressive intervention, rather than working in harmony with the body's own currents. The result is that the bones would "heal" in a brittle manner and not be as strong. Thus they could later be discredited as quack treatments - yet they were NOT really Becker's protocol.

I think this has been going on for years, but that now it has become "normal". It reminds me of the studies done in the UK at the beginning of COVID on - I believe (hydroxy-chloroquine???) - where people were given high lethal doses in order to discredit and discourage its use. But I also remember in the past 2 decades that I have been studying natural remedies for health, that often studies would be done with like 100mg of Vitamin C to show that it did not help with a cold. This is done often with natural substances in low doses to give the impression that it does nothing, when in point of fact, it is the higher doses that do the therapeutic work. Big Pharma has clearly hijacked the entire area of health and healing.

Being close to bodies of water has always given me a sense of peace, and I have heard on many occasions that there are plenty of demonstrable health benefits to having green time in nature, but especially near water.

So the question for home use is how to simulate this.

My approach was very much in line with Emoto's work, where you use your consciousness to "program" a quality like gratitude into the water, and then have that water become a part of you. Pollack went more into the science and reinforced my "belief" in what I was already doing.

I vaguely remember him saying that EZ Water is programmable in 5D because the water has 5 charges (+2, +1, 0, -1, -2). If true, this would make us water beings far more powerful than a quantum computer which is 3D (on/off/in between). Then arises the question: Who or what programmed us in 5D? Or perhaps even more dimensions?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

urgh... quantum woo - unhelpful.
Charge is one quantised quantity.
There are fundamentally different kinds of QC ;-) which one do you mean?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

That phase of water takes place at boundaries, hence in the body most of the water is in that state because the system is so compact the water is always near a cell boundary. The diagrams of pipes, like in a home, is just too simple and wrong.

I think all we really need to do is to drink fresh vibrant water - not the dead stuff from the tap or bottles - put the minerals back. Altho very expensive here, I do sometimes buy Italian mineral water. I have been trying to design a water flow system that runs through crystals, but finding lab equipment here, and then having the "permissions" to buy it has proved tedious.

Not sure! I'm more of a philosopher than a scientist. I love to listen to people who know a whole lot more than I do, in the hopes of getting something useful, or at least interesting out of the talks. I have not read Pollack's books, but I imagine the answer to the question of the charges is there. Oh, and remember that all science begins with woo! 😉

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Science begins with hypotheses that then have consequences that might be investigated.
Physics is still called "natural philosophy" at Oxford - might be good if it was always called that, as science was born out of philosophy. ;-)
Some really venomous battles took place in medieval Europe's universities between natural philosophers and theologians.
one example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condemnations_of_1210%E2%80%931277

Science begins with hypotheses that then have consequences that might be investigated.

Agreed, and this is not to take a stab at @blurtyield as Woo Woo most definitely is out there! It's just that too people look to science as the final arbiter in life, and it should not be that way. It's almost as if people no longer understand what a hypotheses is; as if science either knows ,or it goes in the Woo Woo wastebasket!

Physics is still called "natural philosophy" at Oxford - might be good if it was always called that, as science was born out of philosophy. ;-)

I did not know this about physics at Oxford, nor would I have ever imagined it! It's funny to think that when Einstein was trying to go beyond 3D, he would have been considered Woo Woo! AND... when he finally did get beyond 3D, into 4D, he considered the other physicists of his time that were considering 5D and 6D... you guessed it, they were in the Woo Woo camp according to Big Al! 🤣

Some really venomous battles took place in medieval Europe's universities between natural philosophers and theologians.

Venomous, and for many lethal! Yet, I'm not sure if we are any more civilized today, as real debate is no longer welcomed in modern official science. 🥺