In Lanka's own words: "At the time I was still a student who had had the opportunity to work in a laboratory and using his findings on nucleic acid discovered a structure in a seaweed that I mistakenly defined as "a harmless virus". In reality, as I will explain in detail later, this structure was what is now called a "giant virus", which is really nothing more than a mini-spore similar to bacterial phages, which are also phages. So what I isolated was actually a "giant virus" but I classified it as a "harmless virus”. Today we know that mini-spores arise when the subsistence conditions of certain simple organisms - such as the bacteria or algae I worked with - become unsustainable.
--
It became clear to me that if I only criticised the postulate of a single virus and did not mention the rest, I was reinforcing the virus theory. And if I did not challenge the conceptual framework from which that theory springs, I was reinforcing it. At the end of the day, everything stems from the theory of cellular pathology according to which we are born from a cell, there are only material interactions and it is a "poison" - a word that means "virus" in Latin, by the way - that makes us sick. That is the scenario since Virchow coined this theory in 1858 although he was only "a child of his time”
--
In short, if one looks at what virologists do, one concludes that no, there is no such thing as a virus. Knowing the history we understand that it is in fact a wrong model and that the correct one was censored. Later I will discuss in detail the 7 points that virologists make to support their conclusions and how at each point they refute themselves. Dr. Hamer's system of knowledge in itself refutes Virology as a whole. Once I understood his theory, the veracity of which anyone can check with themselves, I knew that it was impossible for a virus to assault my body. Do viruses exist? No. Simply because they cannot exist. You look at what virologists publish and you realise that they refute themselves. They act in an unscientific way because they never carry out control tests of their experiments, which is the minimum necessary to be able to affirm that something is scientific or not."
Source: "Stefan Lanka DSalud Número 249 English (1 of 3)"
https://truthseeker.se/stefan-lanka-dsalud-numero-249-english-1-of-3/