Would the infallible identification of the culprits help you to be satisfied?
Let's assume that it would. In all the news there would be. We would have finally identified the masterminds of earthly affairs.
What then? Wouldn't you then have some demand? Would everyone then say: All right. We have them! Now that we have all the information and identities, we act. We eradicate the evil.
You imply that Hitler was right. Hitler, who considered himself the downtrodden and manipulated of the Jews, the "little man of the street", therefore had to become like them in power. Since they had become known as money traders and credit lenders. They had risen to great heights. To become their equal, they had to be beaten with their own weapons. Hitler wanted to get to the root of the evil, i.e. kill all those who had a bloodline to them. Make their business impossible, take their fortune, etc.
In this way he became a spitting image of his enemy.
If you have identified the evil-doers, and according to this way of thinking you must, would it not be consistent that you want to see the known heads cut off? That you wish for their death? If so, you would be justified in killing them yourself. Since you yourself cannot get to them to carry out the assassination, who then shall do it?
I'm really not into finding culprits or cutting people's heads off, just exposing deceptions, and the news is a deception so im not interested in what they say anyway.
I never expressed any interest in Hitler in this post, he was just another puppet figure. It was you that brought that character into the discussion here. Apparenty he lived out his life after WW2 in Souh America and died in 1963 of natural causes.
Right, you didn't express it.
How shall I receive the above graphic, where I see the Jewish star and then the names who are exposed as "Jewish"? I don't get it. What IS in your eyes the message behind the given graphic?
Hitler is the most famous example of targeting the Jews in recent history.
Now, do I really need the connection from where the masters of deception come from or which blood-line they have? Is it not enough that deception takes place?
Is it possible to point out deception without showing those one thinks are the main actors? I really ask in a genuine manner.
If I have a moment of understanding, a moment where I got rid of an illusion, how can I communicate in which way that happened without using shame and blame? What would be your alternatives? Do you think it is sensible to ask for alternatives?