What a kangaroo court. CBC is shilling hard for Turdeau as usual, censoring any comment that isn't pro-Liberal (pro-globalist). Canadian Civil Liberties Association is all over this:
This week we have heard from federal officials but none have been able to back up the claim there was a national emergency as defined by the Emergencies Act.

We have argued from the very beginning there was no national emergency within the meaning of the law. Witnesses have now stated that the government declared an emergency using criteria found outside the confines of the definition of the Emergencies Act. The government’s position seems to be that it was entitled to do so. This is profoundly disturbing.

The government witnesses to date have admitted that the government did not feel bound by the plain language of the Emergencies Act. Their understanding of what constitutes a threat to national security was broader and included things the Act does not contemplate. In brief, to deal with a crisis, the government acted outside of the law.

National emergencies that authorize extraordinary powers cannot be in the eye of the beholder. The criteria for using the Emergencies Act is not suggestion – it is carefully prescribed law. The Commission has another full week of evidence to hear, but the evidence to date suggests it will be very hard for the government to meet its burden.