Esoteric perceptions and exoteric measurements will converge, if both are true.
That we have biological instruments that cannot yet be replicated by technology does not mean they won't be. But, even then, the signal processing will be different.
Voice to skull is a good example that people should be familiar with - the human perceives sounds and hence assumes it is hearing, but no sounds are involved in the signal. A tech transmitter and receives can create, send and decode the same signals, but a computer will not "understand" the actual content of the message, and will not react to such meaning.
I find it amusing how Aristotle's Metaphyics remains more important than his Physics - of which it was the last chapter (at least it was edited that way some centuries later!) His Physics is filled with errors and only of historical importance, whereas the last chapter, dealing with "first principles" remains interesting as many of the questions have not changed. The answers have though, as speculative philosophy becomes natural philosophy. I rarely use the word "metaphysics" - it's just speculations pretending to be real. They might be real but that can be discovered with having a precise question and precise tools and manifested effects.
That does not stop humans having powers that the scifids (science fideists) regard as "not science", or heresies, but that is the class of science-priests talking shit. But to prove those powers are real requires more un-blinkered researchers. Diving into the arms of "metaphysics" just to avoid the very hard problems of experimentation does not interest me. I can easily accept the experiences while rejecting the metaphysics as mere speculation.
I certainly hope they both turn out to be true, as there are so many unanswered questions out there, that need different approaches from the ones we have been using thus far. I'm still not sure how you define exoteric? I suppose I define it as wisdom beyond Earth? 🤔 Or knowledge gained from non-earthly beings? 🤔
I think we'll have the technology eventually! If the Human Energy Field is real, then what can be seen by humans will in time have a counterpart in technology that will do the same or similar. Depends on whether the perceiving of these energies requires organic material. Cyborgs? 🤔
I have to admit that I first heard of Voice to Skull technology from Corey Goode, a so-called Secret Space Station whistle-blower, so I haven't given it much credence. From what I'm gathering from what you're saying is that this technology does exist? I wonder if this could account for the many people who channel voices from the stars! The jury is still out for me with regards to many of the alien contactees.
I never got into much of Aristotle's work, and I hardly ever use the word metaphysics. I remember reading a book ages ago called Stolen Legacy: Greek Philosophy is Stolen Egyptian Philosophy by George G. M. James. Wow, that was a really long time ago, but I remember the argument was that Aristotle learned much of what he knew from Egyptians, and that most of his work was plagiarized, hence the errors in his work, as well as explaining how he was able to write on so many different topics. My days of intermingling with members of different Black Nationalists groups like the nation of Islam, the Five Percenters and the New Black Panther Party. 😆
Added to the vocabulary list!!!
I also prefer experiences. And I like the phrase you introduced me to, if I remember correctly... experiential esotericism, which for me includes observations that are repeatable. Firstly, the best would be direct experimentation, like what Rupert Sheldrake did, or way back in the day with Russell Targ, Dean Radin or Edgar Mitchell's Institute of Noetic Sciences.
But I also appreciate the great body of work that Michael Newton did with Journey of Souls: Case Studies of Life Between Lives and all that followed after.
exoteric = third person science
esoteric = first person science
I've mentioned this before, tho maybe some time ago - did a quick experiment once with my group of gifted kids - playing around with a Hall probe, that detects static magnetic field, so I thought we should test it on us - people! lol. I asked them to focus on the head - I thought the largest field would come from eyes - but no! It came out from the ears!! One reason headphones are dangerous - especially wireless sets! This is also the reason why binaural beats work - it isn't the sound as such, it's the EM signal generated by the magnet in the speaker.
The tech for bioenergies already exists - it just isn't pointed in that direction - not in public research. Else they'd find out how catastrophic wireless signals are to organic life.
Public science remains strangled by materialism - I don't understand how a person can go have an EEG or ECG or MRI or MEG and still believe they are machines unaffected by the signals that their scans have proved to exist!?
I don't understand this. 🙈
Isn't that an absolute irony! It goes to show that common sense isn't so common. And yes, public science is so far behind reality. I'm sure you already suspect, much like myself, that private science is using much more esoteric and exoteric sources than is publically known or admitted.