the almighty "reward-pool" is comprised of 100% inflation
this "reward-pool" is distributed evenly by the number of votes made in a one week period
if only one person voted one time during a single week
100% of the reward pool would be funneled into that one vote
regardless of the blurt-power controlled by that single user
of course, more blurt-power means you have a larger vote payout
proportional to your blurt-power DIVIDED BY the number of total votes during that one week period
Total bollox! Where do you get this from? obviously NOT from reading.
Try to understand first and then maybe make some valid points.
if fewer people vote
each vote is worth a larger percentage of the "reward-pool"
is this statement TRUE or FALSE ?
TRUE
not an insight - I've been explaining this every week for over a year.
BUT
FALSE if those non-voters power-down and stop voting entirely.
people with no blurt-power can't vote anyway
how is this any different ?
What is "this"?
"this" is your example
Your question proves to me that you didn't read those 3 articles! lmfao
If you had, you wouldn't have asked it.
you've done a phenomenal job of communicating your point of view
👍