here is the video that was scrubbed from youtube,
https://odysee.com/@alltheworldsastage:0/Jimmy-Dore-Interviews-Robert-Malone-9-14-About-Covid-19-Vaccines---The-Science-of-mRNA-Technology:6
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
They leave only the videos of bad doctors and fake experts or corrupted politicians.
thank you very much for the post and the link, have a nice day
Yes censorship, bad bad bad, but it's important to also know that Malone has suspicious and powerful ties to the vaccine industry, and should be taken with a grain of salt, a big one.
that's what makes it even more puzzling that his interviews are getting targeted
also
i enjoy analyzing propaganda
It makes him look bonafide, riles up more support for him. He is a snake.
is there some specific claim they're promoting that you disagree with ?
my main take-away from that interview is "the pharmaceutical industry is lying to everyone"
He is heavily invested in the next generation of covid vaccines. He will simply say, "that one was bad, but mine is good."
He supports vaccination in general.
He espouses viral theory as if it is incontrovertible truth, and it is very likely completely false.
So it's ironic that we laud him for being muted for "spreading misinformation", because he is spreading misinformation. This guy is controlled opposition.
ok, thank you for clarifying your objection, you make valid points
here's what impressed me the most
i see malone as a bridge between the "provax" and "novax" camps
malone says it doesn't make any sense to vax children and healthy people, i believe this is an extremely valid point, EVEN IFF someone is "provax"
malone also believes that "natural immunity" should be considered equivalent to "vax", which i believe is cogent and convincing, EVEN IFF someone is "provax"
sure, sure, malone is not "antivax" or whatever, sure, but they are not nearly as "pro-mandatory-universal-vax" as CNN and the WHO and pretty much every "official" "news" source
malone represents an important "middle-ground" that is much more practical and nuanced than "provax" versus "antivax"
when we see everything in stark "black&white" binary terms, the "news" has a distinct advantage
link skips to 800 seconds
link skips to 800 seconds
A
video,
which was scrubbed from youtube : /