I don't think so. There have been times I have agonized over one choice or another, wanting both, or not wanting either, or similar. I cannot say that the final choice was "predestined."
But I like the idea of a cooperative society - like the blueprint I offer. Competition for money/power is gone, and cooperating to solve problems emerges.
The Detailed Blueprint (for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns) (7 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
This is why I work so hard to bring this about.
are you suggesting the outcomes of your agonizing decisions are uncaused ?
No. I am suggesting that I choose with free will.
ok, so, your decisions are caused, either by previous events or by random noise, or some combination of the two
i'm glad we can agree
Well, not caused by - influenced by. I cause the choices.
I AM.
good answer
It's math a matics
And QuackerY 🤬🥓
this is what happens when you forget that ontology is only a model