- Commandant or Follower?
- The Energies of Life: Parts 1 - 8
- Psychopathy and Crimes Against Humanity
- Political Ponerology - Predators - Part 2
- Open Secrets - Political Ponerology - Audio
- Political Ponerology - An Incendiary Device - part 1
DTube | Anchor | Spotify | Breaker
Google Podcasts | Pocket Casts | Radio Public
Join the Blurt Discord Community:
https://discord.gg/VdyHxMYncY
Thanks for this. A few points.
THEY see themselves as different, see themselves as the revolutionaries - everyone else is a lower order. The disease is manifested in society - it is not the pathogen itself that is diseased - it is just acting out itself - the disease is the consequence.
One of the large societal changes is to normalise the pathological, while also pathologising normality.
So even by changing the labels of the categories does not mean the rest of us have to accept such humans.
I also mentioned, and would need to look back if in a post or comment, the energetics as a hypothesis, but going even deeper into the biology.
lol. That's why universities call their course clinical psychology or experimental psychology - all by definition being behaviourist models.
What I don't buy is that your idea of "conditions" somehow happen - like the weather - and are taken advantage of, whereas what we see is that the conditions themselves were planned and created by the very people who see them as the best conditions to go full throttle - even if it is done by their ancestors. Hence, what may seem genetic may be familial conditions. The very word "plandemic" describes this.
all for now, thanks :-)
This is true of Adaptive Aggressives, but they don't see themselves as revolutionaries, rather they simply see themselves as different and unique, and yes, everyone else of a lower order, unless they are influential people. Dynamic Aggressives, on the other hand, do consider themselves revolutionaries, like Elon Musk. They also see others as inferior, but in a certain sense, it is because there are so few people like them.
This is what the DSM of Psychiatry has done to humanity!
But outside of the universities, the field of psychiatry considers itself a science!
We continue to see differently on this, as I believe these conditions are prepared for AND planned for! But I do not believe the conditions are happenstance, rather part of a societal rhythm generated by humans. I think there was a Davos meeting soon after 2009 in which they actually discussed how to manage the crisis period in which they were to decide whether it should be a short, but very acute and painful crisis period, or a long, drawn-out crisis with gradual implementations of their agendas. It seems they chose the latter. You can get more done that way. If I knew the Crisis Season was coming, they certainly know more than me. I remember reading that when Al Gore was Vice President, he always had on his office desk, a copy of Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069! 🤔
What do you think would be the anti-dynamic-aggressives? In this I think that the "opposite" is different to the "complement" - eg a key and lock are complements, not opposites.
btw I don't think Elon Skum is as smart as people think - he is really rubbish at articulating thoughts unscripted - but yes, he is one of those.
Hmm? 🤔 My first response would have to be the Dynamic Assertive. For the most part, it is often the Dynamic Assertive who challenges the Dynamic Aggressive, and hence could be considered anti, but it would not always be the case. Not all Dynamic Aggressives are evil, and not all Dynamic Assertives seek honesty and justice. All Life Energies have an up-side and a down-side.
I will also add that the antithesis of the Dynamic Aggressive would be the Adaptive Support, but it probably fits more into your idea of lock/key, in that they compliment one-another, and one could not function in society without the other. But personality-wise, they are opposites, but not anti.
Elon Musk, like most Dynamic Aggressives, is very cunning, but not a genius. Most Dynamic Aggressives borrow, steal or copy innovated ideas and popularize them through wealth. Musk is no scientist, programmer, inventor, etc., but simply a shrewd businessman, who knows how to move money.
OK, yes, I use the term "anti" in the sense of antidote - like mixing an acid and alkali - in contrast to being complementary and hence coexisting.
Having a one-dimensional parameter, is simple to define an "opposite", but even in simple 2D, there are 2 axes, and hence an "opposite" needs a more refined definition - indeed, there are then three potential opposites - 2 reflections and a rotation! ;-)
You have a good way of losing me, 🤣 🤓 but that's okay; it means I'm in the company of someone I can learn from.
Not that I'm a ruler, but the important lesson is to surround yourself with people who know more than you in different areas of life. I once heard an amazing quote by 50 Cent that he said was told to him by his grandfather. I really wish I would have written it down because it was so well said. It was along the same lines as above, that you can determine your future success by looking at the people around you, and asking yourself if you are getting smarter as a result.
In any case, I'm not sure how to answer your question with regards to anti-Dynamic Aggressive.
Conformists rule the day, for now, but the change is in the air, I can smell it, almost touch it.
It's a slow change for many of us! Like watching a train wreck in slow motion. 🥺
Hi, @famigliacurione,
Thank you for your contribution to the Blurt ecosystem.
Please consider voting for the witness @symbionts.
Or delegate to @ecosynthesizer to earn a portion of the curation rewards!