Have tectonic plate movements been accounted for in your environmental considerations?
I suspect most environmentalists are just not educated enough to be speaking publicly, but maybe someone can answer this question for me that I have been asking the climate alarmist community for years now.
The above image represents just a small few squared kilometers/miles. What I would like to know, is what has and has not been accounted for in reference the ocean levels, as the water would be displaced by any sort of subsurface movement.
Please do comment below, half of my frustration with the climate alarmist community is that I can not have this single question answer and it seems like weak science without all of the tectonic plate movements accurate tracked and directly correlated into the ocean level data.
Without this ocean water displacement data, even an estimation would be better than the nothing I have currently, this is not enough information to make the claim the ocean levels are rising in my opinion.
I wouldn't be surprised that they leave this data out as It most likely will not suit the climate change agenda.
lol welcome to my daily life as an Albertan, we have enough oil for 75% of north America for 100s of years lol but we have a energy crisis
YOU NAILED IT! This CABAL of GLOBALIST ENSLAVERS have seized upon natural cyclic events of this planet as contollable. We arent experiencing man made climate change, we are dealing with UNCONTROLLABLE SHIFTS of our our planetary poles in response to cosmic configurations that seem to be on a 12-13 thousand year cycle. They see a crisis and offer a solution, as if they can can do anything about it! KEEP spreading the offer to think about things via FREE SPEECH FEAR FREE! #LetsGrowBlurt
lol and I thought i was mad about 7000 years, and hear you are talking 12-13 lol these peeps need to clue in.
Be interested to know the answer to this as well. We are less climate change activists or supporters than environmental supporters. I mostly nod along with climate activism as the action taken can be protecting deforestation, salination, pollution etc which is a win in my book. The two get confused, but if it takes climate change activism to help the environmental movement along I'm all for it.
Deforestation should be only done with good research, there is a time and place for everything. new growth on the lower canopy near our head height and lower, needs extra sun to start, so if the forest floor is dead, it maybe a good time for a refresh with consideration for local wild life.
But a dead forest floor is usually teeming with insect and fungal life... It's rarely actually dead. As you say, good research always needed.