This closely parallel s the perilous intentions of the block. Plagiarism vs Terrorism.
RE: COAL-Liste und Vote-Services
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
COAL-Liste und Vote-Services
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
I don't see it in quite the same light. The false Jan 6th narrative involves an acting job by the FBI to try to paint a picture of those who believe in the constitution and natural law as terrorists. The plagiarism issue is actually real, and as I pointed out in my post there are certain steps a platform must take to be immune using Safe Harbor guidelines. Which unfortunately I don't see the actions taken being enough for them to qualify, as they aren't preventing known culprits from continuing to post the stolen pictures and posts etc.
I disagree...
I think THEY got YOU thinking the issue is an issue... Because plagiarism is real. But plagiarism is not an issue for me... You see.
Don't break the block chain to serve only one worldview at the expense of others.
The MUTE AND MOVE ON supports both worldviews.
But I digress... I support YOUR WRITE to support this initiative. I'm lost in the hoopla because as someone who is accused of Plagiarism, I stand more in principle with the jan6 terrorists than I do with HIVE plagiarists...
So more of the wrong thing righter when you let a Few Dicks set the rules and start defining people like me... 😐 I'm used to it by now... But I still won't go along with it.
I gotta book to write.
I see that you are sufficiently charged enough on this issue to make a claim that I'm being mind controlled because I see this differently from you. I see that for sure.
Nothing was changed in the code. Your assertion shows you don't fully understand what was done. As I said in my post, anyone can feel free to create their own front end to the chain without using the COAL list and assume any and all responsibility. If you feel so strongly anyone should feel free to post anything they like regardless, I suggest you start your own app/front end and take the liability for the actions you prefer.
Again this is solely at a front end app level which is not the chain, it's an independently owned app.
This is what I personally do. I've stated several times when the subject comes up that I'm not a policeman and don't have the time nor inclination to spend energy on reporting and rooting out this problem. I move on.
I do support property rights, and the protection of those rights. So there is no question I support the owners of the front end apps protecting their property (app). It isn't my property to tell them what they can or can't do with it. It doesn't belong to me, it's theirs. If they wish to begin protecting themselves, it also makes logical sense.
It's easier for it not to be an issue for those of us not facing any possibility of legal/financial repercussion. Because being it's not our property we aren't liable the way the owners are.
I'm sorry to hear you endured that. I don't believe you'll have that issue here at Blurt. If you do, understand that the results will be different. The Foundation is different, the sense of community is different. I can assure you that false accusations here will be met with a push back that had bite unlike the other chains. No one here will falsely accuse and get away with it.