Deutsch: Bitte scrolle nach unten.
Dear readers,
07.07.2022 is a very important date for Blurt.
At the start of Blurt, the Foundation made a binding commitment to end its regency exactly after 2 years. And now these 2 years will be over exactly on 07.07.2022.
What will this mean?
The members of the Foundation will be normal Blurt users, just like you and me.
The million-strong Witness votes from Foundation accounts will have to be removed on 07/07/2022. This will definitely lead to a different ranking among the top witnesses, as the Communnity votes will become the most important after the Foundation votes are removed. Therefore, I will also solicit your Witness votes below.
The monthly payments to all members of the Foundation must end by 07/07/2022. Until the community will have decided about it, in my opinion, to @saboin the payments should be continued for the time being, because @saboin receives them for his developer work. All payments from our community property to so called team members, guards, moderators, etc etc must be stopped by 07/07/2022. After 07/07/2022, the community shall decide on the allocation of such payments and not a single Foundation member. Since all functions/positions were previously awarded by one person, after 07/07/2022 all functions/positions will be up for new disposition by the community.
As of 07/07/2022, the current Foundation must disclose all Foundation accounts and their balances. Also of accounts from which delegations to other accounts are established. Any Blurt community property must be disclosed as of 07/07/2022.
We urgently need a voting system for the community and for the top20 witnesses after 07/07/2022. The people who promised to create such a system have unfortunately not kept their promises so far. However, a lot of money has already been paid for it.
Until 07.07.2022 Blurt is ruled by a single person.
From 07/07/2022, Blurt has a real new chance to become a decentralized blockchain.
On my own business:
You all know that I have always stood up for the good of small accounts. My actions on Blurt have always been generous and helped many users.
In order to get again a strong position in the witness list, which, as I said, will be re-sorted from 07.07.2022, I ask you today for your witness votes for my witness @double-u.
If you want to vote for me as a Witness, go this way:
https://blurtwallet.com/~witnesses?highlight=double-u
Just one more request: Please reblurt this post very actively so that as many users as possible learn about this very important date. Thank you!
All the best to you! Stay healthy!
Best regards, your @double-u
Deutsch
Liebe Leser,
der 07.07.2022 ist ein sehr wichtiges Datum für Blurt.
Zum Start von Blurt hatte sich die Foundation verbindlich verpflichtet, ganau nach 2 Jahren ihre Regentschaft zu beenden. Und nun werden diese 2 Jahre ganau am 07.07.2022 vorüber sein.
Was wird das bedeuten.
Die Mitglieder der Foundation werden ganz normale Blurt-Nutzer sein; so wie du und ich.
Die millionen-starken Witness-Votes von Accounts der Foundation müssen zum 07.07.2022 entfernt werden. Dies wird bestimmt zu einer anderen Rangfolge unter den Top-Zeugen führen, da die Votes der Communnity nach der Entfernung der Foundation-Votes am wichtigsten werden. Daher werde ich auch weiter unten um eure Witness-Votes werben.
Die monatlichen Zahlungen an alle Mitglieder der Foundation müssen zum 07.07.2022 beendet werden. Bis die Community darüber entschieden haben wird, sollen, meiner Meinung nach, an @saboin die Vergütungen vorerst weiter gezahlt werden, da @saboin diese für seine Entwickler-Arbeit erhält. Alle Zahlungen aus unserem Gemeinschaftseigentum an sogenannte Team-Mitglieder, Wächter, Moderatoren, usw. usw. müssen zum 07.07.2022 beendet werden. Die Community soll nach dem 07.07.2022 über die Vergabe solcher Vergütungen entscheiden und nicht ein einziges Foundation-Mitglied. Da alle Funktionen/Positionen bisher von einer Person vergeben wurden, stehen nach dem 07.07.2022 alle Funktionen/Positionen neu zur Disposition durch die Community.
Zum 07.07.2022 muss die bisherige Foundation alle Foundation-Konten und deren Kontostände offenlegen. Auch von den Konten, von denen Delegationen an andere Konten eingerichtet sind. Jegliches Blurt-Gemeinschaftseigentum ist zum 07.07.2022 offen zu legen.
Wir benötigen nach dem 07.07.2022 dringend ein Abstimmungs-System für die Community und für die Top20-Zeugen. Die Personen, die die Schaffung eines solchen Systems versprochen hatten, haben ihre Versprechen leider bisher nicht eingehalten. Es wurde aber schon viel Geld dafür bezahlt.
Bis zum 07.07.2022 ist Blurt von einer einzigen Person regiert.
Ab dem 07.07.2022 hat Blurt eine echte neue Chance, eine dezentralisierte Blockchain zu werden.
In eigener Sache:
Ihr wisst alle, dass ich mich immer zum Wohl von kleinen Accounts eingestzt habe. Mein Handeln auf Blurt war immer großzügig und hat vielen Usern geholfen.
Um wieder eine starke Position in der Zeugen-Liste, die sich, wie gesagt, ab 07.07.2022 neu sortieren wird, zu erhalten, bitte ich euch heute um eure Witness-Votes für meinen Zeugen @double-u.
Wenn ihr mich als Witness voten möchtet, geht's hier entlang:
https://blurtwallet.com/~witnesses?highlight=double-u
Noch eine Bitte: Bitte reblurtet diesen Post sehr rege, damit möglichst viele User von diesem sehr wichtigen Datum erfahren. Danke!
Alles Gute wünsch' ich euch! Bleibt gesund!
Liebe Grüße, euer @double-u
Thanks for the reminder. I will see how the new ranking will look like. If saboin or megadrive drop drastically, I will vote for them, I think it's a good idea to keep the current leaders in the top 10.
Hi, for your information:
https://blurt.blog/deutsch/@double-u/i-give-up-this-time-for-good
Hi, I no longer have any ambitions.
But, what I really do not understand ...
There is talk that quite a few things (blurt.blog etc.) are property of the Foundation.
All this was paid from community blurt after all.
I don't understand why the Foundation should have a claim to it.
My comment is serious.
I agree with you and with my friend
https://blurt.one/blurt/@mariuszkarowski/blurt-foundation-transparency-report
Why don't you tell people what you done when you were offered to have your own frontend and your own control, with also Dev's
Why double u sir why, this is very bad.
You have always escaped from helping blurt and affected blurt more badly. You have never done anything except running pub, that was also giving benefit to a limited number of users.
Now you are coming again after you sold a large amount of tokens in dirt cheap price and caused the token to drop heavily.
And in case the takeover happens and you be the top, this time I will be the one leaving the platform and I will let you handle the dev work.
You pretend always like you care, but you have never helped in the development and I don't think you ever will do in the future
If Double-u becomes in charge of Blurt, I think I would start a new project.
Oh wonderful!
I love to hear that and take you at your word!
You write only out of context and not understandable nonsense!
And just by the way: How do you know that I sold my Blurt.
After your "war" almost all German users have left Blurt and sold their Blurt.
Edit:
Oh wonderful!
I love to hear that and take you at your word!
That's the response I have expected from you. Very well.
You had started the "war" ... not me.
I will not even term this as a war with you, it's just defending blurt from your bad intentions
I never had and never have bad intentions!
You have massively insulted and badly portrayed members of the German community!
I will be like you do on your words 😆
Edit : the community will now decide who supported them and stayed and who ran away
Everything is public , even your transactions
When you joined Blurt, the anger was amplified because you insulted German users.
Everything is public, so I won't justify it. If people think I did, let them belive.
Oh, a very arrogant statement from you!
It suits you.
I'm interested to see what value you intend to bring to the community, will you run nodes, image servers, social media accounts, maintain and host frontends, deal with takedown requests, develop external partnerships and synergy relationships?
I'm also concerned that when things get expensive or hard you won't stick it out, you abandoned your Dig validator (which is like a witness) when the upgrade made it so it couldn't be run for free on a RASPI you downed your validator instead of paying for maybe a $10 to $20 VPS per month.
You also left Blurt when you didn't get your way, our team has been here through spam attacks, "rooster" attacks and infrastructure attacks and resolved the problems and pulled in specialists when needed to solve them, do you have generalist technical knowledge to ask the right questions and pool together the right people when a fire situation presents itself? (The foundation and I do!) And are you or anyone else happy to take on that responsibility?
You have harmed Blurt and many accounts more than anything imaginable with your immature and rash behavior and with your countless lies!
You can't know why I stopped my dig validator!
Here on Blurt was often described my financial generosity.
It is ridiculous to say that I stopped my validator because of the few $ server costs.
As so often, from such unjustified accusations against me can be seen how the aggressor himself thinks with greed and avarice.
I did not delete your support vote, because I always had the confidence that you would return, you can contact him in this image that my vote is still for you...
I am very happy about this great news...
Congratulations, I am very happy to have you here again...
Hi, whether I will come back is not certain.
It depends very much on what position I will have in the witness list after 07.07.2022.
Thanks for your vote!
lmfao. As always, your self-interest is A1 priority.
Do not pretend otherwise.
This has nothing to do with self-interest like you!
You are a greedy exploiter!
See picture.
To the explanation for the other readers:
@blurtyield is also an account of @rycharde who exploits Blurt since Blurt exists.
So @rycharde uses the account @blurtmob, which has a high delegation from community blurt, to vote and enrich himself. And this on a grand scale!
I think this is old and recently if you check you will not find any vote from blurtmob on his post recently. @blurtyield has it’s own purpose as well. Anyone is permitted to have more than one account and for whatever purpose. I thought you left blurt, if you didn’t powerdown and left maybe the price of blurt would have been much better than this, it is safe to say you tanked the price of blurt drastically that a small user with 1000 blurt lost interest in blurt. Your actions made many to follow you. I think the comment about your A1 interest from @rycharde came as a result of how you sound. It came to a point that when your name was mentioned anywhere in our small groups it was controversy and divided opinion all trying to forget about you and move on. Note also that you were very popular amongst users and some came to your pub to engage and have fun and of course get some of your votes but what did you do after a heated argument? You powered down tanked the price, made people doubt what blurt was all about, made it look like a one man show when clearly you were not seeing the intentions of this man as you quickly judged him. Dear W who did you help on blurt to better his or her life? Lastly do you want the devs to work for free? Can one person run blurt all by himself? collectively blurt is moving well and improving. On a personal note I will be happy if you buy blurt and power up and avoid/clean the conception of violence that comes with the name @double-u
Wow so he was one of the reasons why the price of the coin dropped drastically☹️ . The price of the coin is the main thing I believe is giving this platform setbacks from improving when it comes to the term of more users. Personally I gave a lot of friends I will have invited to this great platform but they are still giving a doubt due to the low price of the coin. I will also be happy if he can please and please invest in blurt again by powering up.
And please and please @double-u, even in ur article I can personally feel the conception of violence in it for real. Making the minority like us feel unsafe. BLURT TO THE MOON 💯
look at your self. Do a self analysis - your whole ring.
Your weasel attempts to infiltrate the foundation and cause disunity was noted and didn't work. So here you are again.
You are the biggest grabber here on Blurt with the 200,000 Blurt monthly you receive for doing nothing and with the self-vote shown above using Blurt community assets.
Ich persönlich glaube nicht daran das die Votes am 07.07 entfernt werden.
@Megadrvie hat irgendwann und irgendwo mal gesagt das die Votes verlängert werden wenn die Foundation(also er @rycharde und ich glaube @saboin ) der Meinung sind das wäre schlecht für Blurt .
OB es gut oder schlecht wäre für Blurt wenn die Votes am 07.07 entfernt werden kann ich nicht sagen, aber mit einer Sache hat @double-u recht .
Erst wenn die Votes entfernt sind kann man von einer echten decentralen Blockchain reden wo die community die Top Witnesses bestimmen.
Werner vielen dank für die Erinnerung das damals gesagt wurde das die Foundation Votes entfernt werden.
@tekraze Einem großen investor vor zuwerfen das er seine Token verkauft hat und damit den Preis geschädigt hat ist etwas unfair . Was hätte er den machen sollen das Geld liegen lassen auf einer Plattform mit der er nicht mehr Einverstanden ist ?Jeden Monat nur ein paar Tausend Blurt verkaufen wäre dir das Lieber gewesen ? Wie lange hätte er dann bitte darauf warten sollen das er sein Investment wieder zum Teil zurück bekommt ? Ich schreibe zum Teil weil ich weis das er damals wo Blurt 10 cent gekostet hat gekauft hat.
Die Foundation hätte genauso gut auf @double-u zugehen können und ihm ein Angebot machen können für seine Blurt ,was Sie aber nicht gemacht haben.
I personally do not believe that the votes will be removed on 07.07.
@Megadrvie has sometime and somewhere once said that the votes will be extended if the Foundation (so he @rycharde and I think @saboin) are of the opinion that would be bad for Blurt.
Whether it would be good or bad for Blurt if the votes are removed on 07.07 I can not say, but with one thing @double-u is right.
Only when the votes are removed can we talk about a real decentralized blockchain where the community determines the top witnesses.
@tekraze To blame a large investor that he sold his tokens and so damaged the price is a bit unfair. What should he have done to leave the money on a platform with which he no longer agrees? Sell every month only a few thousand Blurt would you have preferred? How long should he have waited then please that he gets his investment back in part? I write partially because I know that he has bought when Blurt cost 10 cents.
The Foundation could just as well have approached @double-u and made him an offer for his Blurt, which they did not do.
Von wieviel BP reden wir hier denn, bei den sog. Foundation-Votes???
I would like to see a link that proves that they made such promise, I couldn't find that anywhere !
I agree... Is there some sort of public statement?
Maybe that's the answer I was looking for : https://blurt.blog/blurt/@clixmoney/rdiwrd
Check that thread please.
Ok, this is a good starting point 👍Thank you! 🙏
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/
Der Regent account hat eine Voting Power von 50 Millionen wenn ich mich richtig erinnere.
Hier findest du mehr dazu und auch das versprechen ihn nach 2 jahren abzuschaffen
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/
Yes, I do mention this, and because of the way he moved, he not only lowered the value but also sold his stake in loss, so that's his loss, not mine.
He also left Digchain, because he did not want to pay for a server. So its not just the platform, double-u s own choice
They have offered some solutions, that were rejected by double-u so, I would not say anything more on this.
By they I mean, Jakob, Megadrive and double-u because it's their personal chat,
and I only knew offers were given, but those were not taken.
I don't know more than this, what happened there.
so, before blaming, do your research well.
You did your research because u know that their was a personal chat ? Have u a prove that their was a offer to buy the blurt in the private chat ? I dont think so .
I am also in a group with @double-u and the rest of "the gang" and if their was an offer he would told us 4 sure .
Maybe he does not share everything with you. You should ask him same
@nerdtopiade knows everything about this point.
There was never an offer!
Oh, megadrive seems to have lied again. OMG, how many more times. The whole chain is infested with lies!
There was never an offer to me!!!
Zero offer!!!
Jacob will be able to testify to that. He is an honest man.
You are the one who embarrasses yourself by stupidly believing lies without asking.
You could have asked Jacob or me.
Zero offer!!!
Jacob and I said that you are welcome to run your own frontend and put whatever restrictions on it you like and make it a Blurt german front end. We said there would be cost if you wanted us or our devs to do it and also monthly fees, you didn’t want to incur any cost.
Your comment is off topic!
Tekraze had stated that I had received an offer for the Foundation to buy my Blurt Stake from me.
Such an offer never existed!
That's correct I never made you any such offer, Jacob might have in his personal capacity, but not sure if he did or not, but nothing official from us no.
You can't know why I stopped my dig validator!
Here on Blurt was often described my financial generosity.
It is ridiculous to say that I stopped my validator because of the few $ server costs.
As so often, from such unjustified accusations against me can be seen how the aggressor himself thinks with greed and avarice.
Well that's the reason your server operator Dotwin gave in the public Dig channel for switching off your validators. If that was not the true reason then you were publicly dishonest.
First of all, Dotwin is not my server operator. He helps me very often.
Second: It is from me the truth that the shutdown has nothing to do with these ridiculous server costs.
Again and again your imagination comes to light.
he uses the term "we" and you all downed servers at the same time when RASPI was no longer supported, in any event it was a co-ordinated exit and clear association.
Please ask @dotwin1981.
He wrote this.
The issue here was money.
It was not about these ridiculous server costs for me!
We in this case means . We the pi user .Their was 4 or 5 validator that used pi to validate dig.
Honesty is the initial capital for the growth of a community.
funny
Yes, that's right!
That's one way to say it ;-)
Oh, did you edit your applicable comment out of fear of your boss?
I take back my words that I said without confirmation.
You are not blurt team member for taking this kind of action and announcements
.
You already said you are going to leave blurt.blog so you should never ask for support & vote..
True man always faithful with his words
People who don’t like Blurt and the Blurt Foundation should just go and create their own Graphene Blockchain. It’s super duper easy. And very cheap. I will create one for you for $100,000
to some extent I agree but we already have 3 and it gets continually harder to move people around and more and more split, I am not saying I agree with everything people on any side say but at some point people will have to work their issues out and find a way to debate it out and exist together and everyone be happy, everyone feel heard and have their say and then respect democracy because the other alternative is about 1 million various blockchain social medias, which I guess is fair enough if thats the way it is going to go but they will all be pretty sparse.