Hey @khrom … I see that @dusty.sparks actually bought Blurt on Ionomy. I don’t think he would create 10 accounts to earn a few Blurt.
RE: Twitter/X alternative Twetch lets you to earn money for posting, liking, commenting and sharing content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Twitter/X alternative Twetch lets you to earn money for posting, liking, commenting and sharing content.
Thank you for your trust in me.
Want to help promote Blurt ? Join the New Blurt Promotional Community and create artwork and videos to promote Blurt on Twitter, Youtube, Dtube, etc etc,
Join: https://blurt.blog/hot/blurt-167427
Help people join Blurt : https://joinblocks.org/blurt
Don’t power down… Stick around and buy 1 Million Blurt … even on Hive-Engine if Ionomy is not working …
Hive-Engine : https://hive-engine.com/trade/SWAP.BLURT
How to Send Blurt from Hive-Engine to Blurt Wallet : https://blurt.blog/blurt/@offgridlife/3bjbey-how-to-send-blurt-from-hive-engine-to-blurt-wallet
ok but then the key question is who did it? and for what purpose? looking at the fact that @dusty.sparks actually looks like a decent user after all his moves because he writes cool posts and actually bought a lot more blurt on his own initiative, who could care about doing such a thing?
Don't get me wrong, it's really very suspicious that someone does such an action the day after creating his account. the transfer of the sum does not prove it either, because we have activities such as voting circles, etc. Follow these transactions yourself. You would come to the same conclusion as me.
If, for example, Dusty had been with us for some time, e.g. for a month, and such an action had happened, you know, I would have approached it less harshly. But the fact is that it happened the day after he created the account and that quite recently @danish578 made the same call and I just assumed it was the same person because the method of operation was the same.
If @dusty.spraks is really telling the truth, it needs to be clarified because other users may fall victim to a similar situation. Then there are two options:
either someone knows who dusty is and wanted to do something dirty to him for some reason, or someone is messing with the blockchain for an unknown purpose, e.g. he could deliberately attack users who deposit something so that such an action could take place and make them angry? Although option 2 sounds quite unlikely.
I thought the same thing at 1st .. then I also noticed that @Dusty.sparks had bought lots of Blurt on Ionomy then I thought ... who cares if he went and bought 10 new blogs. It was 50 Blurt that I had sent to Blurt Creator. If he created 10 Blogs for himself or his friends who cares, as long as he eventually uses them to create good content.
This pisses me off because this is the second time someone has cleaned the blurtbooster.
And why did he create 10 blogs? maybe on the voting circle? you know, you buy a lot of blurt, then you run a machine with posts on 10 accounts and each one votes every day... 10 accounts are needed for this;] if so, someone will immediately add him to the blacklist.
His outrage is too great and he shows 0 understanding of the situation. He is never attacked unjustly, only on the basis of obvious evidence where the coincidence is unlikely. A person with pure intentions does not behave like this. Especially since I lost my tone.
Really ???? … He is the only person I see buying Blurt on Ionomy. Who cares what he does. We need people buying Blurt if we ever want the price to go up. If he buys 10 blogs like Ctime and MK and then buys 1 Million Blurt for each one and uses them to upvote people is that not a good thing ? Why are only Ctime and MK the only ones allowed to own 10 blogs ? Maybe he had plans to burn millions of Blurt like Ctime ??? Who knows. But he had lots of crypto to buy more Blurt. And now he will go buy Hive I guess. We have to stop driving away new Investors. This is what Hive does.
man, I'm not a clairvoyant. I have no idea what the guy is planning or what he has planned.
I'm just here because I looked at blurtbooster and noticed strange activity again. I followed this activity and found this account. I left a comment requesting a refund, presenting screenshots of the transaction, and that's it. Is it my fault that the guy is pissed? Well, not really. If he is innocent, then the blame should be placed on someone who did it, and if he already created these 10 accounts, it was enough to say something like: hey, relax, I'll need these 10 accounts, or, sorry, it wasn't my intention to drain anything. Instead, he started getting pissed and turned on.
By the way, regarding what you said... Of course I'm happy for anyone who wants to join the group of investors, but... Investors decide the direction of the network here. If a huge amount is bought by people who only intend to drain the network and don't give a damn about it, we won't benefit from it either, because there may be a temporary increase, but then when their profits are withdrawn, there will be a decline.
Of course, I'm not saying that Dusty Sparks has such an intention, but I'm saying that there is no point in selling your soul for a few satoshis of growth on the stock market.
In my opinion, if he has serious plans, he will not be discouraged by this situation. The serious investors we want here don't behave this way.
See, for example, Cornell, he was also pissed when someone robbed him and he was also angry that MK was monitoring his movements and for a moment he suspected that he was trying to fake something, but he stayed anyway, which means that he is characterized by the thinking of a prudent person who does not act hastily and that he cares for the good of the platform.
And this situation was much less fair towards him because he was the victim of the theft.
In this situation it is the opposite. and yet the guy gets mad at the robbed person for being mad at being robbed? what does this say about him?
Yes… I had to work very hard via Discord to convince R2cornell to stay. I have learned to ignore the complainers and buy the dips … Blurt, Bitcoin and Tron. It has worked out well.