Paradise Lost

in crypto •  last year 

As if we didn't have enough psychopathic terrorism from our unelected global elites, here comes AI!

Notice they had to smuggle in some of the global hoaxes, such as the next plandemic - I'm surprised they didn't include the climate Club of Rome hoax.

Statement on AI Risk - you can also add your signature.

Now, nuclear war is an interesting add-on as the arms race was left to escalate to the point at which deterrence and mutually assured destruction (MAD) became valid protocols. MAD would make no sense in an age of of mere chemical ballistics.

Here is a thread of wetware intelligence talking...

Here's a fun film:

And here's what can happen with AI plus nuclear weapons.

Fiat Lux.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last year  ·  

and earlier today...

mmm... will AI be the alien hoax?
something suspiciously similar about rounding up the fearful sheep to protect them from some synthetic threat - so long as that threat is blown up into existential proportions.

  ·  last year  ·  

EU, US should push for AI code of conduct: EU tech chief

The EU tech chief spoke to members of the EU-U.S. Trade and Technology Council about the need for a voluntary code of conduct prior to the forthcoming laws.

wtf is a COC?

According to Vestager, this would create safeguards while the new laws are still under development. She stressed that the new laws will take effect in two and a half to three years time in the “best of cases,” which is “obviously way too late.”

"we need to act now." she added, somewhat stupidly contradicting herself.

  ·  last year  ·  

Can artificial intelligence prevent the next financial crisis?

No. More likely it will trigger one. But do read the shit coming in the pipeline - to safeguard your privacy and safety while in reality doing neither.

  ·  last year  ·  

27,000 Traders Bet $17,500,000 on ChatGPT AI Stock Picks, Chasing 500% Returns
https://dailyhodl.com/2023/06/02/27000-traders-bet-17500000-on-chatgpt-stock-picks-chasing-500-returns/

What the article fails to mention is Blackrock's ALADDIN: https://www.blackrock.com/aladdin

  ·  last year  ·  

more elite terrorism coming...


all to protect you, of course.
protect you from a dangerous freedom.

  ·  last year  ·  

indeed, it was only a few African leaders that stood up to the plandemic terrorism...
they were all shot down.

Boosting Inclusive Obedience = BIO

  ·  last year  ·  

It's difficult not to gag listening to these almost-humans.
homo fidelis expanding.

  ·  last year  ·  

How can an "NPC" play "Minecraft on its own"!?
NP=P?
;-)

  ·  last year  ·  

maybe the humans will then just stop playing pointless games.
recall when tic-tac-toe was interesting.

  ·  last year  ·  

interesting


only 4 hours.

  ·  last year  ·  

Not sure why he buys into the climate scam and then, when talks about details, rightly blames the corporate scum who are trashing the planet without any punitive costs.
Garbage in, garbage out, if you put fake data, such as vomited out by the climate alarmists, it's not just an increase in the alarmism, but you may end up with totally wrong solutions.
He also hampers his own mission by seeking to control power by removing power - that just results in new power - rather than in seeking benign-power.
Anyway, haven't yet finished it.

  ·  last year  ·  

AI – is Skynet here already?
https://www.aerosociety.com/news/highlights-from-the-raes-future-combat-air-space-capabilities-summit/

He notes that one simulated test saw an AI-enabled drone tasked with a SEAD mission to identify and destroy SAM sites, with the final go/no go given by the human. However, having been ‘reinforced’ in training that destruction of the SAM was the preferred option, the AI then decided that ‘no-go’ decisions from the human were interfering with its higher mission – killing SAMs – and then attacked the operator in the simulation. Said Hamilton: “We were training it in simulation to identify and target a SAM threat. And then the operator would say yes, kill that threat. The system started realising that while they did identify the threat at times the human operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective.”

it gets worse...

He went on: “We trained the system – ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.”

classic - be careful what you wish.

  ·  last year  ·  

also, classic naive-coder-dev, designing a game and forgetting all the possible feedback loops plus out-of-game collusions.

Be very careful about defining top level aims.

  ·  last year  ·  

yep.
be good and we'll tell you lies.

  ·  last year  ·  

Now, why can't most humans see that?
It starts with the right questions.

  ·  last year  ·  

subversion


from the inside

  ·  last year  ·  

Interesting to see how commietard Canada was even in 1970/80s.
Even the Cold War was fake - just two experiments destined to converge.