We must follow the evidence wherever it leads

in covid-19 •  2 years ago  (edited)

Dr. John Campbell, who rose to fame on YouTube for his practical and measured approach to the Covid outbreak in 2020, was initially in favour of lockdowns, masks, and "vaccines". He appeared on major networks around the world and really made a name for himself, promoting the official narrative. I watched him regularly for information for a few months, but as time went on, I found him to be intellectually dishonest - and a raging statist who supported anything the government decreed. I gave him the nickname "Doctor Lockdown" and stopped watching him altogether. Recently, I was shocked to see him taking a very skeptical and critical viewpoint in his recent videos, and investigated his latest content. I found that he - with his millions of followers - had experienced an epiphany, done a 180, and now shares excellent research into the ineffectiveness and harms of the mRNA injections! He hasn't taken a shot since late 2021, no longer wears a mask, and is reaching a lot of people with the truth!

image.png

Just like Dr. Campbell, I am willing to admit when I'm wrong. I had the wrong impression about him all through 2022, and was avoiding any research he put forth, assuming he was still backing up the status quo. I'm extremely pleased to find that he has changed! I now subscribe to him on YouTube once again, and eagerly look forward to whatever he's got to say. "Follow the evidence, wherever it leads" says the banner behind him in his videos. I remember commenting almost exactly that, on his videos in 2021, admonishing him for backing up the lying government and mainstream media. So I must tip my hat to him, and thank him for seeing the light! He is now fully evidence-based, and putting out excellent truthful content that is well-researched and extremely skeptical of everything he once supported.

I've seen quite a few comments on his videos that say what I'm thinking. "Thank you for having the integrity to change your stance based on what the facts are telling you," for example. This guy built up a MASSIVE audience in a very short time, with his British accent, simple graphics, calm demeanor, and ample research. To realize he was wrong - essentially to "wake up" and go back on what he had been saying - must not have been easy! To be honest, he was such a statist stooge for a while there, I assumed he must have been paid to be that way. He got on the BBC several times, even. It made me quite sad to have such a popular voice spouting what was clear (to me) to be absolute nonsense. So I'm abundantly pleased to find he has turned away from the dark side.

Science can be misused, I wrote the other day. Not everything done in the name of science will lead us to the truth. And even good science can be taken by unscrupulous people to reach bad conclusions and justify going in the wrong direction. Science is the best tool we have at interrogating the universe around us, and finding our way, but it is limited by human fallibility.

"I was wrong" is one of the most powerful statements we can ever make, and one that can lead us to personal growth otherwise unobtainable. Dr. Campbell realized he was wrong, and began to truly follow the evidence no matter where it led him. Now I too must admit that I was wrong - about Dr. Campbell! Now that I know he has changed, and is pursuing the truth with his significant intelligence and experience, I have no problem tuning back in, and encouraging others to do the same.

So please, consider subscribing to him on YouTube or Rumble.

Dr. Campbell's latest findings

This new video (also available here) talks about a recent study that found mRNA from Pfizer or Moderna injections can be found in the bloodstream of some recipients at least 4 weeks later!

The Danish study found 1 in 11 people still had mRNA in their bodies 28 days after it was injected into their arm. Not just spike proteins, but the actual mRNA, which is what is found in the "vaccine". The researchers were able to definitely prove that the mRNA did not come from a SarsCov2 viral infection, but from a Pfizer or Moderna shot.

We've been told the mRNA, which is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, does not replicate. We were also told it would not leave the injection site (deltoid muscle in the arm). And yet the mRNA was found all through the bloodstream, up to (and probably beyond) 28 days after administration of the "vaccine". Researchers discovered the mRNA was taken up by the lymph nodes and transported to the spleen (in the abdomen).

So either the mRNA is replicating, which we've been told is not happening, or it survives for at least 4 weeks in the body. Health officials had previously told the public that once the mRNA was transcribed into spike proteins by our cells, it would dissipate in a matter of days.

Why haven't studies been done on this by now? Knowing how long the "vaccine" stays in the body is incredibly important, but it took an incidental finding by some independent Danish researchers to bring this out into the light! We now know mRNA does not rapidly degrade, and it doesn't stay at the injection site. This also calls into question the assumption that it does not replicate in the body.

As Dr. Campbell says, "why haven't they been looking for this?"

A larger study on this topic needs to be done immediately. Why does the mRNA persist in 9% of recipients, but not the rest? What effects does it have? Is it replicating? How much longer than 28 days does it persist? Does this have anything to do with the shedding/transfer problem? Does it have anything to do with the serious side effects of the heart, brain, and other organs?

Let's not forget, it's the spike proteins themselves which cause illness. Covid (including everything lumped into "long Covid") is caused by spike proteins. People are literally injecting themselves with genetic instructions to make toxic and deadly spike proteins... or in the case of Novavax, injecting the spike proteins DIRECTLY! All to supposedly protect themselves from a virus that is covered in those same spike proteins! Whether you get it from the bioweapon shots, or the bioweapon virus, you're getting the same engineered depopulation protein!

Thanks to the Danish study, we know the "vaccine" is either replicating inside the body, or doesn't dissipate rapidly as promised! We must follow the evidence wherever the science takes us, even if that's not convenient, easy, or comforting.

DRutter

banner2023.jpg

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Heyyy, it's doctor lockdown! What should we call him now? Wow that is so miraculous and heart-warming to see people come to the light side. You weren't exactly wrong, he kind of started out as a bad apple, but thanks for the update. He looks like he's lost weight too. Maybe he's overall mentally and physically healthier. He must've had an awakening. It's kind of a funny, ironic bait-and-switch: he built up a massive following of statists just to have an audience to tell them the truth, haha gotta love it.

WOW! mRNA, nut just spike proteins, and 28 days later! Do we even know what we're injecting ourselves with anymore and why? Maybe they've been making these "vaccines" since "28 days later" came out lol. I'm really really curious about that 9% hmmm.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

I say that crap stays a lifetime!

After reading the post it is clear that you have a strong emphasis on following the scientific evidence regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

You have brings up important points regarding the effectiveness of lockdowns, masks, and vaccines, and how following the evidence is essential to making informed decisions.

One interesting question that comes to mind after reading this post is how do we ensure that the evidence we are following is reliable? With the influx of misinformation and false information regarding COVID-19, it can be difficult to discern what is trustworthy and what is not.

Additionally, how do we address and combat the spread of misinformation in order to promote evidence-based decision-making?

I also appreciate you for emphasizing the importance of following the evidence, as it is crucial in making informed decisions regarding public health. By acknowledging the uncertainties and complexities surrounding the pandemic, we can work towards finding effective solutions and mitigating the spread of COVID-19.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Was great to see he changed his view on COVID etc.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org