You've Been Lied to about Cancer

This is the second of three posts that come to very similar conclusions although coming from different branches of medicine.

The vast majority of diseases have a metabolic origin - no genetics, no viruses, no bacteria (apart from as secondary causes). Ever since medicine was hijacked by money, the world has descended into a sewer of sickness.

This particular video is about cancer. You know the medical bullshit; they are always so very close to curing it, they just need a few more billion dollars. And just as with viruses, they have conned the vast majority of people, and the vast majority of so-called medics, into mistaking the effects for the causes - and thereby ignoring the true causes. Why the con? To control more resources, through accumulating money that then gives them further power to distort the truth - and to censor any scientific debate.

The book is very good and thorough. Go to Thomas Seyfried's website and check out Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer (Wiley, 1st ed., 2012). [It is also available at libgen, if you can't afford to buy a copy.] The website also has many other research papers.

The key discovery is that cancers are mitochondrial metabolic diseases. The primary cause are reactive oxygen species that disrupt the normal cell respiration. These can lead to mutations and genetic damage, but these are just one of the effects, genetics is not the cause. The weird thing is that cancer cells use a different metabolism to normal cells; they use a fermentation process employing glucose and glutamine and cannot, once cancerous, revert back to oxygen respiration. Hence, by starving such cancer cells of glucose, they will undergo cell-death, or apoptosis. The rest of the body can easily survive on ketones instead of glucose - cancer cells can't use that pathway either.

As always, when there is substantial evidence that the medical-pharmascum complex don't like, they try to subvert it by claiming that parts of the theory are correct but not as important as their own attempts at genetic modification and chemical-death. Here is a recent such example: Revisiting the Warburg Effect: Diet-Based Strategies for Cancer Prevention. Seyfried mentions the work of Otto Warburg:

For his discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme, the Nobel Prize has been awarded to him in 1931. This discovery has opened up new ways in the fields of cellular metabolism and cellular respiration. He has shown, among other things, that cancerous cells can live and develop, even in the absence of oxygen.

This was all known 100 years ago but, as Seyfried put it, Warburg was "thrown under a bus". Seyfried went back and repeated Warburg's experiments, and with new equipment and data was able to modify some calculations and mechanisms, but the theory was essentially sound.

One side-thought here; one of the coming 5G frequencies is 60GHz, which is one of the resonant frequencies of oxygen. Expect more cancers. As another aside, Royal Rife was heralded as having discovered a "cure for cancer" in 1931, before also being thrown under a bus by the establishment that had lauded him just a few years earlier.

That period of the early 20th century was an astonishing time for scientific discoveries; just before the money moved in to turn science into another business venture. Propaganda is not knowledge, but how many can tell the difference? Keep playing stupid games while ignoring the game of life; then you too can become an NPC.