What do you think?
As it is not an obligation, just an idea for those who want to follow the recommendation, each user decides whether to send part or all of their earnings to null or not, in each post or in all of them.
They should continue producing their content regardless of whether it is curated or not, although I believe that the number of publications will decrease much more precisely because they do not feel supported and will even be deceived by an elaborate system that has many flaws and is not usually fair, although It is actually a personal decision to continue participating in Blurt through posts, votes, reblurt and comments, @ctime.
We have @power-down, @steemhive-images, and @delegation-out... but, and @voterone, do you know what it means or what it refers to to help other curators?
as I wrote, you receive upvote from them when:
@power-down - when you have active powerdown you don't get doubled vote
@steemhive-images - when you add a post from another blockchain (copy/paste) you don't qualify for double vote from my account
@delegation-out - If you have delegated part of your BLURT POWER to another account then you will not get a double vote from my account. Everyone should invest in their own accounts!
that's what I noticed after some checks