How the weak ego'd libtard, thinks he's saying sorry....
Now that one of our 'much respected witnesses' and a consultant to megadrive (apparently) have now decided to post elsewhere first, before posting here on blurt, a question came to mind....
(just let me remove my tongue from my cheek, delete the sarc tag, and vomit up the hypocrisy, and I'll continue).....
Question : Does this image above need to be the new blurt logo?...You know, something that fully encapsulates the entire ethos of those in the higher echelons of blurt ?.....
Doesn't it make far more sense just to use 'the other blockchain' as a 'place holder' - and then just link from the post on here ?
( rather than copy pasting word for word, image for image, the exact same article to the blurt blockchain?)
The same information is readily available ( duplicated) , and simply a click away....
Obviously this isn't plagiarism , and any author is entitled to do as they wish with their own material (as opposed to an author feeling entitled to decide the free speech of other individuals, in the comments section) , but does it help blurt in any way whatsoever, to add this information to this blockchain ?
On a personal note:
....this kind of observable behavior hardly inspires any confidence in the witnesses of the blurt platform - or the faith that they themselves , so called 'leaders of blurt', have in the future of the platform.
(the virtue signalling, empty 'word salads' being very much 'not in simpatico' with these actions).
With around 30 posts just in the last 15 days elsewhere (and only half a dozen comment IN TOTAL from ALL these posts), and only 8 posts on blurt in the same period - many copy paste from the original - it seems that milking rewards is the motivation and not any real interest in building the blurt platform itself ....(again , running contrary to the vapid words saying something very differently).
Milking rewards for duplicating a post is not 'pro business', and is far more like 'pro profiteering'.
The same goes for self upvoting to....(imo).
If people have nothing different to say, why bother saying anything ? ... (if milking the system is not the aim ?) .....which is fine when it comes to extracting wealth from what might be seen as a dodgy enterprise.
Whichever way you look at it, it most definitely doesn't send a very positive message - in terms of the blurt blockchain and the people who decide YOUR options on th platform, via the witnesses being responsible for making decisions on how the blurt blockchain operates....
I cant use blurtlatam.intinte.org , i try to log in and nothing happens.
Yeah it is a thing to cross post and have different comments on different platforms
And different coins .
selfvoting in all honesty , to me , is an amazing feature , less hypocrites than farming with tons of accounts to play lowprofil , but as your stake is your investment and selfvoting is your mining/staking ...i see it the other way around , as a bank , you invest , you get a % of your investment ... everyone should only mine and stake , they would take seriously their investment and the need to invest... because , you cannot ask others to love your posts and vote for it and it is only about 10 a day ( which are mostly farmed anyway ) ( also you should know that in the background , many people are begging for votes instead of buying the coin, this does not help the price either as they just shitpost and powerdown what they get , this for 80% of accounts )
On the other hand , If we had a stable coin or just staking option at 20% , like in hive or whaleshares we wouldnt need to selfvote or use upvu ...i would totally love a stable coin and this feature would help tremendously the attraction of new investors .
I cannot change my mind on this , especially when i paid my coin 5c and pour all my savings in blurt ( as i see it as a bank and i am not a great blogger or wont beg for votes , platforms are investement first , blogging is a side dish , at some point this will be clear )
But i understand your point of view , if a platform was a beautiful place to share beautiful things for everyone , it is clearly not 100% that way .
That would not only be a shame, but also counterproductive. If it were the case that these platforms were primarily investment opportunities and did not also offer content that was valuable and interesting, the entire sphere would become impoverished.
Instead, what is equally true everywhere applies: the richer a sphere is in different actors, the better. I am a blogger through and through and little interested in trading coins. Investors need people like me, preferably lots of them. Because they give a sphere an authentic face to the outside world. I need them vice versa.
If blogging were only used as a means to an end, it would be like me making soup every day and not allowing any variance, there would be a dull soup each day. The soup would be the result of my daily performance of duty, yet I would expect to be paid for making soup. That would be a contradiction in terms. It would be an "as-if-I'm-interested" existence. Making content for the contents sake.
Imagine someone coming to you and saying, "Invest here in this place!" and he shows you an empty space where nothing is produced, nothing is expressed, there is nothing but the empty stage. You would give him the bird, wouldn't you?
So he can only inspire you when the stage is already being played on and the performances are alive. But if he only offered you a bank account and said that the performances on stage were only a means to the end of having an account and you could trade tokens with other account holders, why would you be interested in such a thing? Token trading and profit margins were devoid of their basis, namely stage performance. It would be like when "investors" went to the theatre and in the foyer they would offer the tokens to each other, but since no one was playing, but everyone just wanted to trade to make a profit, the interest quickly died down.
Because people would ask: Yes, but what exactly am I investing in? Where is the idea, where are the stage actors, where can I orient myself? Because coins alone are worth nothing, they have no life in and of themselves.
Conversely, if there were only the stage and no paying guests or patrons (investors) who were enthusiastic about the performance, the actors would be penniless and their stage would tire itself out for lack of event.
Of course, this is just simplification. People are not only this or that. They can take on many roles and intentions.
Ultimately, every investment is an investment in yourself. It causes others to invest in themselves and as a result there is an exchange. Since your "vested" interest is always slightly different from mine and it is this difference that attracts. Not the same, not what you have heard and seen before, but the new, the first time, the surprising, the personal and intimate. The differing detail in the interface of the common.
Very true also , that is why i added this comment later on
I shall have say bloggers instead of products and investors in the blogging platform
Which is really what it is ...i enjoy voting on great contents , on bloggers . Not so many .
But one dont need to be both , but most are neither .
That is where the line is drawn between real bloggers and investors , which represent 20% or less
In the middle of shitposters and carefree profiters .
A great plateform would be quality bloggers and investors or being both .
Hive is winning with their games ( and HBD staking 20% APR of course ) with games as background because many people love to play games , something we dont have in blurt .
Hive also have some good bloggers but good bloggers is tough to get .
"...The best milker there ever was..."
How "professional" lol