How Blurt's HF3 Will Affect Vote Values and the Economy

in blurtopian •  4 years ago 

It has been a long wait, but Blurt's Hardfork 3 is almost upon us. It includes a lot of changes, many of which you will need to read about from the coders; here I just wish to outline the economic changes that I have been involved in designing. I have written about these before, but this is an opportunity to bring them all together and describe what I expect to happen.

There were four economic changes considered but, in the end, just three were implemented; the thing left unchanged is the curation curve, as most people seem to like the fixed 50% curation rewards independent of vote timing.

Firstly, it is worth being aware that both the reward pool and the recent claims "pool" work on a 15-day cycle. This means that what you may see immediately is not what will happen once this cycle is completed. It will take at least 15 days for both macro-economic parameters to respond to these changes, followed by possibly another two weeks for them to respond to how the human activity responds! So, without any need for concerns or panic, I would expect it to take about a month for those parameters to fully settle down to some new level. How that level corresponds to the vote values you see is the aim of this article.

There are two main changes that, taken alone, would have opposite effects - taken together, I hope they somewhat balance each other out.

Firstly, we have removed the so-called vote-dust-threshold. This means users with low Blurt Power will finally see their votes have real value. We have also edited the reward curve so that it matches the economic system in Blurt. The increase in vote-yields with larger BP will be modest, and not so extreme as on similar chains, but it should encourage users to power-up.

Taking just these two changes, the value of votes generated in the whole Blurt economy will increase, and with it the reward pool will start to decrease until a new equilibrium is reached. Overall, this benefits most users with low and modest BP - anyone below 5,000 BP should see a significant increase in their vote values. This should greatly help the onboarding experience.

The other main change was in the way the Blurt macro-economy works, with the reward pool responding to the actual size of the active Blurt economy - this means the sum of vested BLURT compared to the total minted BLURT. This change on its own would see vote values initially decreasing, and the reward pool increasing. However, as the reward pool increases, it will start to pay out more rewards and thus slowly balance itself.

Indeed, this latter change is quite subtle in that after a month it will appear to have little effect! But the key is that the Blurt economy will slowly react differently to changes in powered-up vested BLURT. This means that everybody benefits from an increase in vested coins. No longer can some people complain that votes are sharing a fixed trough and hence taking anything away from other users - I have always thought this was encoded bad psychology, the feeling that everybody else is diluting your value. This also solves the issue whereby a fixed rate of newly-minted coins is being dumped on a saturated market, as in similar chains.

As I said, after a month, few may notice the subtleties, but it is important to know that positive actions have a positive effect on both the whole economy and the individual user.

The overall effect of these changes rather depends on how voting activity grows. I expect the latter macro-effect to be the most prominent immediately. This means that vote values will initially seem lower but that everyone will see their Blurt Power have some power. After two weeks, those vote values should start to creep upwards and find a new equilibrium. Beyond that, it really depends on more users, more posts and more votes!


Please vote for my witness account @busbecq.
Can be done directly here.
Thanks!


Final thought: I'm not the person to ask when HF3 will take place - just follow @jacobgadikian and @megadrive and wait for news.

Last final thought: admins of Blurt front-ends that show votes and rewards will have to change the formulas working in the background. Please get in contact on Discord to implement this. However, users please be aware that there may be a disconnect between what you see on a site and what you receive in your wallet - the wallet is always correct.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

Appreciate the breakdown.

Firstly, we have removed the so-called vote-dust-threshold. This means users with low Blurt Power will finally see their votes have real value. We have also edited the reward curve so that it matches the economic system in Blurt.

So glad to see this. So many I interacted with simply didn't have the means to reach a stake high enough to not be dust. It forced a system where less folks were unwittingly throwing away their votes on comments that would never reach that threshold. Worse was that dustsweeper program where one could subsidize the votes they received. I shouldn't have to pay to boost someone else out of that dust level. It shouldn't be dust to begin with. Well done sir.

No longer can some people complain that votes are sharing a fixed trough and hence taking anything away from other users - I have always thought this was encoded bad psychology, the feeling that everybody else is diluting your value.

So much this. I cringed every time I heard the term reward pool rape when someone was voting their stake as they saw fit. So glad to see someone sane acknowledge that the fault was in the math/distribution. It's contradictory to say "Hey folks, come invest and power up stake, but don't use it the way we don't like or you be rapin the pool and downvotes (theft) it will be for you.

Will be eager to see how it plays out, both short and long term. Thanks for being the teams math expert. So much more goes into this than understanding math formulas, like being a decent person who can empathize with positions of a lower economic status.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Thanks!
And yes, ultimately the code is based on the maths that is then based on some underlying philosophy. It's not even about being fair or equitable, but in designing a game that everyone can play, whatever their level.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

designing a game that everyone can play, whatever their level.

100% THIS.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Firstly, we have removed the so-called vote-dust-threshold. This means users with low Blurt Power will finally see their votes have real value.

Nice.

  ·  4 years ago  ·   (edited)

image.png

This is just amazing! From my experience I've been always talking about this kind of changes because I think that the most important people in this kind of platforms is the final user, because ok we need people that put their money in here but if you don't have content creators in here and you don't motivate them to stay and encourage to keep powering up with great benefits, then all those invested money will be a waste of time and effort.

Thank you so much for all your proposals bro, I'm a new Witness right now and seeing what you're doing in here I can learn a lot to build amazing things too within Blurt!

I'm right now encouraging musicians to enter in our blockchain and create a lot of awesome videos, and with this news I know that we're going to be able to motivate them to build something amazing in here!

Thank you so much for this updates! I can't wait for HF3, let's bring Blurt to the moon and beyond!!!!

I also voted for your Witness, let's keep growing!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Many thanks!
I hope the changes will be good for users; I did think that people need to be aware and informed that vote values may fluctuate for a few weeks before settling down.

I also hope it will help onboarding too.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Great news. These look like really good updates to me.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Thanks! Fingers crossed we haven't missed anything in the code itself.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Yay this is great, the ever waited changes is the reward pool as many of us wants to have liquid aside from the BP. As I believed based on sir @freakeao said last Sunday, the HF is being implemented. Does this mean HF is now happening?

HF3.png

Anyway I already voted your witness account @busbecq few days back.

Thanks for this update sir.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Yes, some rewards will be distributed as liquid BLURT. I didn't mention that as was not directly part of my work, and because we have no secondary coin (such as a BBD. lol!) to worry about, that change doesn't really affect the economics.

Thanks for the witness vote :-)

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Really I was about to ask about the BBD lol, well you pointed it clear.

You're most welcome sir, witness deserves our vote for of course the growth of the blurt ecosystem.

Congratulations, your post has been curated by @r2cornell-curate. You can use the tag #R2cornell. Also, find us on Discord

Manually curated by @blessed-girl

logo3 Discord.png

Felicitaciones, su publicación ha sido votada por @ r2cornell-curate. Puedes usar el tag #R2cornell. También, nos puedes encontrar en Discord

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted by the @blurtcurator communal account,
You can request a vote every 12 hours from the #getupvote channel in the official Blurt Discord.Don't wait to join ,lots of good stuff happening there.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

so, the "reward-pool" is proportional to the TOTAL BLURT-POWER

and is calculated on an approximately 15 day cycle

i'm not sure this changes anything fundamentally

does the "reward-pool" NOT increase total supply ?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com