You're funny...
You sound here like a seriously hurt person, and you must also be delusional because you're talking about people who aren't there.
....mega actually used the joke I had ( me taking the piss outta myself, declaring my' apserger traits'), and then he pointed out my Asperger! lol).
...libtards and commies have no sense of humor, do they ?
It took you longer than mega to throw in 'the delusional' card...bless.
If you have any empirical evidence, I'd love to see it....Im waiting..or are you just emoting? (commies do love that kind of thing).
... I'm not saying that they are not talented people, but they have NEVER participated in ANY DPOS project, they have never even written anything on any chain.
Want to make a bet ?
Lets say 50,000 blurt per their actual username name, proved via copy pastes/screenshots/conversations with them ? (on steem)
Oh shit, maybe i was delusional and imagining them!! lolol.....easy money for you then !
Are the inferences of 'not in reality', illusory etc - , the best you've got ? seriously?
My estimation of your intelligence had just gone down a notch...
Ready to take me up on that bet now ?
.....man enough to put up your blurt with your convictions, or will lefty spinelessness take a hold ?
50k blurt per account for proof on steem for:
lets be clear:....
stefan molynieux, (philosopher had 400k + subs before banned on you tube).
styx(hexenhammer666) - still on you tube and on other platforms - over 500K followers,
Longho (goats 'n'guns)...big personality all over the place, writes on zero hedge 100's of thousands of followers.
...Larken Rose - (libertarina)...had a few convo's with him on steem - dunno how many followers he now has.
....oh, and Caitlin Johnson (the lefty name I'd forgotten - want to do another 50k for her, as well ?).
....ready when you are....
Or you gonna back out, make excuses, (they weren't the precise user names on the original post !!!!!!)....and look incredibly weak ?
...I'm waiting...
I must say, this was much easier than I thought - outing the WEF supporting stakeholder capitalism model/ communists/ authoritarian lovers that i called 'the polish crew'.
You're in good company, Tusk is a big fan to!
At least everyone will be able to see clearly just what blurt really is...(once I get organized on medium and adding another substacks account).
It has nothing to do with changing blurt, I'm past that idiocy - I'm just using all the material for my own purposes.
It's good to leave with full political disclosures across the board.
....plus all my extra blurts from the bet - I'm sure you're man enough to stand by your convictions !!.
(..... if i wasn't imagining them in my delusional head, of course...)
oh....
Yes, this is your way of survival, but not your survival, but the survival of your illusory, unsupported theories that make you feel perceptive and smarter than all these idiots, psychopaths and narcissists who are supposedly here.
Well, I'll stand by my words, nothing illusory.
(fyi....I do have an IQ in the last 0.1% range - to the right of the bell curve.
This is according to my IQ test when I was 11, that is. (a scholarship to get into 'an elite school' - so there is that. That's not illusory, either).
I did mention it on steem to...I think...oh shit, maybe I'm imagining that to..!
And I'm sorry that I called you an asshole, it wasn't a malicious thing to call you an asshole, I was just calling you an asshole, I was just pointing out that in your obsession with your theories, you are becoming an asshole and maybe it's time to stop and ground yourself before you loose contact with reality ?
Never apologize for saying what you really think. Its weak.
....as opposed to apologizing for being incorrect, which is the sign of being an adult, (such as individuals on steem that you categorically said were not on steem - or just take the bet! lol)...
I haven't put forward ANY of my theories - only using theories widely accepted, applied forensically by myself, using the linguistics that others provide on social media (including yourself).
It's not an obsession (compulsion), it's required useful material needed for upcoming projects (not on blurt).
My reality is very well grounded, ty. Garden, Luce, my doggies, living in the countryside, fishing etc...
It's the delusional commies you need to worry about.
I've always been an asshole to people who hate truthful intercourse, I take no offense.
(I do have very good friends though. ..No commies in my dojo!).
I'll await for your 'Yes' - on taking me up on the bet concerning these those individuals that you said were never on DPOS !
Cheers, matey !
oh this hexenhammer with 23 subscribbers? :D
https://www.youtube.com/@Hexenhammer666/
btw some evidence that
@Hexenhammer666 is @styx
or that this @molyneux is an account of this person: stefan molynieux
Just first examples shows that you living in a world of delusion.
I won't comment on the rest, I don't have time for your games anymore.
Write specific evidence, screenshots please, and preferably links to blockchain transactions - if there were any, they are still saved in the chain.
I'm not responding to bullshit, just to specifics
I left some links on a comment I made a little while ago on your post.
Yes this styx - 508k subscirbers..lol
Your emotional dis-regulation is showing.
I would advise working on that before it gets out of hand (npd/bpd lie that way).
I wouldn't have taken your blurts by the way, it was an experiment
(....and I've talked quite regularly to several of these individuals over the years, who I'm sure would be more than happy to confirm their leaving the dpos experience... lol).
You're funny, my friend.
Thanks for taking part.
Well, where is the proof that he published it on DPOS and abandoned it?
And most importantly, even if it was so, what was the reason?
Let me guess the downvotes :P
I didn't have time to look him up when I responded to you before. But I also followed Styx when he was there. I almost didn't as I assume the need to put 666 in one's name is a cry for attention that screams issues of incompatibility. However I checked out an initial video and found him highly intelligent and humorous in his mocking of the absurd social scene we're in now.
https://steemit.com/@styxhexenhammer
https://hive.blog/@styxhexenhammer/replies
He didn't leave due to downvotes. Neither did Stephen Molyneux.
They made a huge mistake in mimicking what we see here at Blurt now. They thought they could make this a faucet and not interact. Just post, and get rewards. In their cases, they were reposting what they posted elsewhere, so it's all gravy for them.
In Stephen Molyneux's case, I followed him as well very briefly. I commented a couple times to him, and was ignored. I unfollowed him as I can watch the videos he provided on YouTube for free, and I wasn't going to waste my limited voting power on him as he felt our community was beneath him.
Many influencers make this mistake when they come to Dpos. In the case of Styx, I found him funny enough I continued watching his video posts.
In other words, this is proof that dpos works and does not reward you for doing nothing, as Lucilin writes in almost every post:P.
Commitment is rewarded, but it should also work in such a way that if an investor wants to support such creativity with his shares, even though for most people it is just copy-paste, he should be able to do it. This is what was spoiled in previous DPOs by dwonvots because even if I supported such an author, someone else would come and zero my value.
we don't know if YouTube demonetizes such people. Another issue is that there are people who deserve more for their work than the rate that YT pays them.
Especially since these authors did not have to have the attitude of "we are above you". It may just be a simple lack of time.
Unfortunately, when you run many activities and projects, you always have to validate where it is worth paying attention to and where it is not. There are, for example, people I know personally, such as @grzegorzplaczek, who is a member of parliament and does not run any personal profiles, not even on Facebook. And now, for example, you will pay someone to run Facebook because you have 140k recipients there, but, for example, you can automate it on Blurt because you have, let's say, 20 recipients. It could have been the same with these two.
One does not negate the other. One look at the Hot and Trending here on Blurt is proof that low effort is often rewarded.
I'm going to write a post that will address things both you and Marius have talked of, as despite the opposing views you two have on some issues there is overlap. I don't have time today.
yes, but first of all, always try to pay attention to details and beneficiaries. you can often see shitposts in trending that have a 600 blurt reward, but if you look closely, it turns out that they have, for example, 70% to null delegated and they simply got an upvote from ctime. So, in fact, such a post has a value of 180 B / 2, so the author receives 90 B.
There are many such posts.
you would like to ;)
I am simply motivating you to clarify your thoughts and statements ;P