I hear you. I'm just thinking out loud for solutions. What do you suggest be don?...not about your current hot seat which I highly disagree with....but about the authority of placing people on this COAL list.
RE: Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.
I think your suggestion on another comment is the best one - let the market decide.
....point out/ put warning sign, on accounts posts (or something) - for plagiarized/spam content etc..- that's it...let the market decide.
Because it will, if left to function.
Until blockchain, I've only ever worked in free markets (in the real world and online), and never had any issues with it - because merit , and not politics, is the metric.
People who do not want free markets ?....They have a reason for that perspective - and it's all negative.
I have zero interest in the mechanics of this stuff, so can't be of much help in that area. (ie. none).
Free market....a term that has vanished from all three graphine blockchains. Time to bring it back.
this might help....
https://blurt.blog/blurtlife/@lucyreloaded/to-clarify-principles-and-not-to-pander-to-fweelings-can-be-tough-for-some-are-you-suited
DECENTRALIZED JURY
link skips to 1128 seconds