How about in the honor of decentralization and leaving the power with the people (blurt community) before anyone is added to the coal list a survey post is to be made. The comments can only be yes or no. Then add them up and go with the majority decision. After all, to put somone on the coal list really is no more than a judgment call. It will also relieve the founders of being labled authoritarians by those who dissagree. win-win
RE: Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.
Agree @world-travel-pro if this is decentralised for someone to be added to a coal list they should actually be assessed by various people almost like a jury. I mean if we have to even have a list at all it should Be validated like jury service and by a random selection not just a set 5 people.
Spot on!.....as usual ;)
Bad idea, matey....it's inviting behind the scenes corruption.
'Direct democracy is like socialism - look great in theory but only leads to a pile of shite.'
...think the '500 baht, representatives doing the rounds, and local elections - scenario ... same thing..'.
...jungle girl will tell you about how it really works (if you don't already know).
I hear you. I'm just thinking out loud for solutions. What do you suggest be don?...not about your current hot seat which I highly disagree with....but about the authority of placing people on this COAL list.
I think your suggestion on another comment is the best one - let the market decide.
....point out/ put warning sign, on accounts posts (or something) - for plagiarized/spam content etc..- that's it...let the market decide.
Because it will, if left to function.
Until blockchain, I've only ever worked in free markets (in the real world and online), and never had any issues with it - because merit , and not politics, is the metric.
People who do not want free markets ?....They have a reason for that perspective - and it's all negative.
I have zero interest in the mechanics of this stuff, so can't be of much help in that area. (ie. none).
Free market....a term that has vanished from all three graphine blockchains. Time to bring it back.
this might help....
https://blurt.blog/blurtlife/@lucyreloaded/to-clarify-principles-and-not-to-pander-to-fweelings-can-be-tough-for-some-are-you-suited
DECENTRALIZED JURY
link skips to 1128 seconds
DECENTRALIZED JURY
link skips to 1128 seconds
Interesting… or more of a @bitsports style with one comment for yes and one for no. But i fear that it can be gamed with stake or sock puppets
Not if it’s randomly selected accounts. Sure some won’t be active anymore but can still go with the majority from day 200 randomly selected accounts or something.
DECENTRALIZED JURY
link skips to 1128 seconds
DECENTRALIZED JURY
link skips to 1128 seconds