Freedom of association is very different to being a witness though. It’s sort of like the M.D of renewable energy also being the M.D. of the least ethical oil company in the world.
RE: Blurt as a Progressive Web App + Mobile App
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Blurt as a Progressive Web App + Mobile App
Not the same imo, see my candidacy example in previous comment. Hive as a technology isn't unethical, just people, there are good people there, the Splinterlands team and community for example, but there are a lot of bullies that make the place undesirable, that I can agree.
I prefer to keep any advantages and bridges I have for strategic and diplomatic reasons. Countries have embassies in other countries even if their policy is different and undesirable. I'm not top20 so not actively governing anything.
The bullies, a lot at least had accounts on steemit long before anyone else was able to register. It’s too engrained. You know what would rlt change hive isn’t ppl contributing to the corrupt ssystem and feeding them all more and more £ is people draining the swamp and pulling out. There are lots of other sites now with same tech that could be worked on. It’s nothint that special. It just has more people developing it cause it’s worth more money. Imo it’s over developed as the general population can just about cash out they don’t know what a layer two token is or care. It’s too complicated for your every day person as it is. It doesn’t need more tech it needs more people lol which they don’t want we then they lose control.
Like I said how can someoen represent two totally opposing morals simultaneously. Like I said below if you are a director for a renewable energy company and you put out an ad about how other sources or energy are causing global warming your directly harming the other company your a director of.