Amplified comment .

in blurtlife •  2 years ago 

Do not confuse decentralization with equality .

Decentralized power has nothing to do with spreading power equally among all . Power comes in the form of earnings , we call rewards on this blockchain . Blurt coin or when staked Blurt power .

Only the way it's bin coded and set up as a tool for it's users , like account management and the blockchain tech have something to do with decentralization . The power users hold in staking's , will never be decentralized like the key's and account's system is for example . I don't think you can decentralize someones centralized private property . So decentralization only goes as far as the tech goes ,..and all human interaction falls under other , not coded or programmed rules of engagement .

Equality in possibility's , equality in options , yes we all have .

Equality in outcome ,.. never , as we are all different .

Witch makes the whole Blurt experience so interesting and fun .
The freedom to engage in post's with a opposite viewpoint to find some reason or truth still unknown to me is what keeps me on Blurt for now ,.. as it is hard to come in friendly and respectful when placing a comment to explore some to me opposite lore .

I know for fact , if you behave like a asshole , the world will treat you as one .

I think we all learned this one way or the other ,.. i did , we all did , and if you claim you didn't then may heaven open before you right now and grant you eternity .

amplified.png

,...... Didn't happen now did it , .. heaven BOOOM open ,.. eternity ? ,.. anyone ? ,.. nope , your all still there ,.. good , as i would not want to yield such power . I mean , you might not want to leave , .. that would be a kind of dick move then , opening such portal before you . And will give you the damn right to think of me as a dick .

It's a natural free working way , it needs no guidance or leadership to let thing's go "right" , it does not need governance . What it does need is maintenance and development . To maintain yes , but where and how to develop ?

Imagine getting your car back from the mechanic ,. he smiles at you and tells you he did some development on it in his bright vision . He placed the steering on the right back seat , to improve third person emerging on the passenger in front and no longer can your car make a right turn , for saving resources and making driving more easy ,.. three times left makes a right to , so no need for a function to steer right needed . Now that would be a fun world now ,.. or what ?

Not ? ,.. well it is exactly what's happening on Blurt , maintenance pushing their personal interest and viewpoint up on the whole chain , mechanics seeing themselves as visionary or leaders for the greater good in there own narrowed vision . This is how dictators are created , this is how freedom dies and oppression will rise . One can lead to freedom but never beyond that . Doing it anyways will only get ugly .

What i miss is Blurt , users and founders the like , never taking ongoing negative WEF WHO OWG NWO driven narratives and upcoming dystopian future happenings like ubi's and social credit coin systems in to the further development of the Blurt chain .
Like will Blurt be a alternative for traders when fiat money disappears and many willing to refuse to fake NWO pushed coin system are seeking for ways to still survive ? Or , like it seems to me more correct , is Blurt heading for a NWO metaverse assimilation ?

Look , in the end i don't care ,.. either way it could bring me some profit , so no need to bug out and save my invest's . personally i have it covered , and am ready to live without fiat money or social credit ,.. as there are blockchains out there that do prepare for the great reset . . and focus pure on trade between people outside of the government controlled system .

Don't get me wrong , deep respect for all that work/worked on maintaining the tech running Blurt ,.. You have the right to feel honored about that ,.. but please don't feel empowered ,.. don't put yourself on a imaginary throne .

Stay free , peace to all .

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I think 100% decentralization is an impossible and even dangerous goal. But trying to maximize decentraliztion (without giving up private property rights and other things we hold dear) is very important. We may never reach it, but we should strive toward it in all ways. Kind of like Liberty. We must always work toward it, advance the cause, keep the faith.
Some are going a step further than "100% decentralization is impossible", insinuating that decentralization itself is the enemy, or to be avoided, or to be viewed with great skepticism. I'm wary of those people because it seems their personal interests are getting in the way of their philosophy/integrity.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Decentralization would , for example , be the opposite of a one world government .
In extreme this means , small local self governed private community's .
They individually may follow their own political structure , but have in common that they are local and by that have the same interests for the region they all live in . Extreme opposite i know , and lot's of chance for evil corrupted community's to ,.. drug lords , mob cartels ,. just name it . But at least the evil will be scattered and not all combined in a one world government . There will be a better chance to bring balance between the good people and evil .
And yes a dangerous goal indeed , but worth the risk i think .
Impossible it is to yes ,.. like Bob Marley said ones in a song ,.. Total destruction , the only solution .
So as an anarchist agorist i , in a morbid kind of way , see extreme decentralization of the global world governance structure as a little light at the end of the tunnel . ... even if i am only dreaming .
. ........ so much smoke ! ;-)