We're all aware of how the MSM presents certain stereotype's - especially when they're associated with sexual practices.
They're a constant source of titillation in the press - which is, in my opinion, far more to do with feeding the vicarious hunger, and repressed thrills, of a voyeur who's safely ensconced in the non threatening environment of an easy chair, than it has to do with anything else.
The politician, or the personality who's been 'caught out', is merely the much needed muse for a sexually repressed society.
An outlet.
Don't confuse the issues - that's what they want you to do.
Have you noticed how the infamous sex predators, the pedophiles, the groomers, the child traffickers, are seamlessly interwoven - conflated - in the press with ' the torrid affair', of so and so, or 'the cocaine snorting MP at a hooker party'.... or...or...or...
WHY do you think this is the case?
The MSM presents very different subject matter as being, essentially, the same thing?
The only common denominator in these massively different subjects - is sex.
Do you think that the child sex predator, the sex trafficker , or the victimization of the innocent are in any way - the same thing as consenting adults indulging in what is 'a playtime for adults?'
...(if you do see them as the same thing- then you have other, deeper, issues of your own to address - these series of posts aims to help out in that regard. I'm here to help.)
So WHY is it, that the press choose to frame very separate issues, it in such a way?
Is it so the sexually repressed individual can project their own shame, guilt , disgust of themselves - onto others ?
It's very easy to look down on ( and very righteously so) and condemn Epstein for being a child sex predator and the total piece of vile scum, scumbag that he was.
And that's because he was.
Thus it is righteous.
Is the press giving the guilty sexual repression of whole populations, a moral vent by reporting this material, and _conceptual adult sex material, in the same light ?
....A mechanism by which you can self righteously and from a morally correct perspective - project their own dark demons, outwards?
And all from a very high, righteous, and socially approved of, pedestal.
While at the same time - by conflating consensual sexual material - gives the much welcomed moral reprieve - of ones own demons?
Reporting the 'MP snorts cocaine off the stomach of hooker ' along the same abhorrent lines - and in the same moral vein as - 'Epstein traffics underage girls for sex', is beyond disingenuous - But it serves to both reinforce your own moral fortitude, and feel less guilty about your own dark and guilty, hidden desires all at the same time.
....the MSM is meshing together the unhealthy, sick practices of the human predators with the very healthy practices of consenting adults.
WHY?
There's a massive difference.
But the MSM not only doesn't want to you to see the differences - they actively go out of their way to present it as ' it's all pretty much the same thing'....
Why is that ?.....
There are various possibilities.
All depending on your own perspective.
My own personal opinion, is that it's ALL about the same age old issue that never goes away.
Control.
People who are living in shame, or guilt - are living in FEAR - and they are always an easier population to control.
People who are free of such things - are a real threat to those who want to control.
What better psychological operation of having control over others, can you imagine?Making entire populations (via religion, and cultural messaging) fearful of expressing themselves and their own sexuality in an healthy, honest, guilt free, open way ?
.....You have a very compliant population without them ever understanding the where the foundations of their own compliance started if you can instill feelings of guilt from a young age.
The subject matter is irrelevant - it's the instilling of the emotion of fear, that matters.
So what better subject matter, than sex ?..One that can be applied to entire populations.
It's THE one common denominator that we all have with each other - irrespective of genders, races, blah.. blah ...blah....
The programming all started from when you were a child - and felt that it was, somehow, 'wrong' to see a woman breastfeeding...
Way before any sexual feelings.
Think about it...
Guilt -unaddressed fear- was instilled in you by simply observing an act of what must be, one of the most beautiful things that the human being can offer to the whole of humanity - the nurturing of life itself.
And you're being made to feel guilty by cultural messaging - by simply being a witness to beauty...???
Think about it....
Guilt and fear - of sex and sexuality.
....The oldest control weapon, of choice.
....Lets take 'the famous powerful celebrity' who likes to be dominated by the sexy dominatrix at weekends, and then being exposed by the MSM .... ( for example) .
Is this just an attempt to smear the individual ?
Or does it go far deeper than that ?
Does it have more to do with supplying a 'sexually depressed' population, 'a fix' ?
Vicarious smutty articles serve to give a population that thrill - a population steeped in repressed sexuality, shame and guilt.
It acts as an outlet.
It gives a temporary ' high'.
....One that offers a brief respite to the unconscious negativity of a soul destroying guilt ridden pathology - and one that is very possibly, one that most people are not even aware of having...
This series of posts about 'sex and psychology' is my attempt to help make people more aware of themselves.
Before I start dissecting the various aspects of such a fascinating subject - one that has very little to with the acts of sex, btw - .......let's talk about me !
.....let me give you a brief summation of my background, as I entered the world of sex as a young adult.
I lost my virginity at the age of twelve.
To an older woman.
She was 13.
In theory, and in today's fucked up definitions of reality - I was a 'quasi-victim'(?).
An older person must take the responsibility, must they not?*
*I'm being TOTALLY facetious, btw.
There were no victims - we both knew exactly what we doing.
....(i'd been jerking off for year or two already, stealing some porno mags off my uncles stash.... reeeee-sult....and she'd had her own experiences also - ones that are of no business of yours).
It's not very important.
Either the story, or my early experiences.
What is important, is that you, the reader, see no guilt, shame, or negativity in this story.
Did this shape me?
...Undoubtedly .
From my relatively wide range of experience in this area, and listening to hundreds (if not thousands) of people discuss this very subject- the first sexual experiences do shape everyone's perceptions going forwards into adult life.
Luckily for me, my first experiences were positive ones( as I saw them).
Some people are not so lucky.
That doesn't change anything.
It's not about fair, or unfair - it's about making things work for you.
It's ALL about how you use - and utilize - those experiences.
That understanding changes everything...(I'll give you real examples of how this works, going forwards)
How you choose to frame those early experiences within your own perception can decide a life of positive outlooks and fun - or a life of negativity and darkness.
And almost ZERO to do with sex - but with your whole life !
These posts are not about who has which sexual parts, and who is acting out which particular roles.
This is about the psychology of the participants, not their sexual bits.
I've experienced seeing these different psychologies at work with many people over the years.
....Obviously I will never name names as firstly, that would compromise my own integrity...
(all these 'encounters' come with a 100% confidentially agreement - Both explicitly and implicitly stated and understood. Contracts I willingly entered into, and as such, will maintain.)
....And secondly, I have no desire to stop breathing - which might be a very possible outcome if I was to ever divulge such personal information.
So with that out of the way, lets go deeper, shall we?
sluuuuurp, sluuuuuuurp....
I'll cover one different 'sexual psychology' per post, so as to avoid confusion.
Many of the dynamics that play out in this sphere can look to be identical, but have very different underlying motivations, and pathologies behind them.
What you see is , very often not what it appears to be....
These posts will NOT have any bearing on any emotional connections, and feelings of an intimate nature, (but will, by the subject matter we're discussing, forever overlap).
Why not include this very large part of the human experience of sex ?
Because they're not relevant.
It's easy to confuse these two things, especially when in an intimate relationship.
Fear of communicating sexual desires, and kicks, can often prevent very loving couples from playing without guilt in the bedroom.
Sad but very, very, true.
Example:
"How can I tell my wife that I want her tie me up and abuse my cock and balls by pouring hot wax all over them ? "
*A real conversation, not a made up one.
This was guy had been married for over 30 years, and had 2 children with wife - a woman that he adored, loved, and respected - but was so scared that he would lose her respect and love if he was to be open and honest with her, in telling her about his sexual fantasies and desires.
Instead, he preferred to indulge his tastes by spending $3,000 a week with people he didn't have to worry about any emotional risks or costs.
As I've said many times in previous post regarding this topic - I pass no judgment on sexual preferences as long as they are consensual.
I DO pass judgment on people who are too chicken shit to be their authentic selves.
Not in a superior fashion - even if it comes across that way - but because it frustrates me beyond belief to see any human being, not be themselves.
This is why 'sex' is such a good arena in which to explore being your true self.
.... as someone once very wisely pointed out "there ain't no atheists in a foxhole"
It's kind of the same thing with sex - and being authentic.
The more authentic you are as a person - the more freedom in the bedroom...and far more importantly - how that expands outwards - into all aspects of your life...
Sex is a fantastic way to confront your own inner demons.
Face them, confront them, be victorious over them, and also befriend them - it's all there.
It's all necessary.
I'm not remotely scared of 'going there' on the pages of blurt - there is nothing you can offend me with, shock me with , or be defensive about, in the arena of sex and sexuality.
I totally get how many people do not feel that they have this freedom - I've seen it first hand, and very up close and personal
So..... PLEASE USE ME.
I'm here, ready and waiting...and wanting to help.
For me, sex it the ultimate truth teller, and by far (imo), the easiest tool to discover your true self.
It has ZERO to do with sex.
ZERO.
Sex is the canvas - not the painting.
Sex is the muse, it's not message.
It's your responsibility to decipher , and thus, discover and understand yourself....
SO......
What sexual fun and games shall we look at?... and where shall we start.....?
Any suggestions welcome if you're feeling brave enough to ask....(no shame in not asking).
...don't worry - I'll just press ahead with my own list...I'm sure I'll be addressing - or at least touching on - many of your inner questions...
Send the strongest men off to die in a war, said every coward ever. Putin. They can not threaten us then.
Damn what i found out today , just awkward ,.. Blurt is the telletubby kids chain aiming for a audience between 2 and 5 years old .
First proof , top left corner ,.. blog written with the telletubby sun , disguised as a flower , as a O . Two ,.. right top , click on magnifying glass , the opened tab will display blurt with a horned beast in the top left corner popping up at the B of blurt .
So @lucylin ,.. before dropping your pants complete ,.. you might wanna check this , for blurt might be set up only to catch the smelly penguin ,.. with his pants down , doing naughty stuff in front of the wrong audience . ;-)
lol - imagine that !...lolol....Honored, I tell ya's!
.....far too late to worry about my pants being down....(not that i was ever worried anyway)
I'm so over it. I feel sorry for men really, that they don't have a menopause, it's like a second childhood. Life is so much simpler without raging hormones.
Indeed, it is !
... but it's not all bad ! lol
While I still have healthy sex drive- my depleting testosterone levels now means that I can actually think about more than one thing 24 hours a day...!
....I can now find the inside of ping ball ball an interesting time/space conundrum, rather than a very hot, very, sexy image, that's worth of spending 10 minutes of my time in the bathroom !
I never said it was bad. Who wouldn't want a second childhood. Who was it said 'youth is wasted on the youth'? or somat. So true. Plus testosterone makes you go bald.
Congratulations, your post has been curated by @techclub
Manually curated by @samhenrytenplus
Yes, this is a question!
I have no idea as to what the question IS... !!!!!!......help.....................
Could elton johns boyfriend be lady di and would that be sexually depraved?
....personally speaking, anything involving elton john is depraved....
Imagine of i had some wild weed...what would i be working on?
Strange pictures...
you're always working on strange pictures, watcha on about?
But i keep getting distracted by trannies...
Your posts are fine, no comments on that. But please do use NSFW tag.
Talking about sex in the open is not nsfw material. There isn't any nudity even. What is nsfw about it?
We have kids here. NSFW tag means not safe work work, but it's also for showing content for adults .
Then its the responsibility mainly, of their parents to watch what goes on around them. Like parents could mute these types of accounts.
I get the feeling of needing to protect the chdren but
But yet here they are. Who is going to prevent them from being onboarded? We can't. Unless their parent or gaurdian steps in and "guides" them for a change.
The fact that children are around is not my concern. They should not be here in the first place in my opinion. And its not like the child would not disable the nsfw function when the opportunity arrises. How many children watch porn these days?
We have nsfw tags not to protect children, because being honest, they shouldn't be on these platforms anyways, but to protect the outward image of the platform itself for passer-bys are anle to read it "while at work" or in public without facing scrutiny.
Yet people face scrutiny just for being honest. I would not be surprised if they tried to NSFW tag truth talking people in real life because, there are children about.
Think about how one sees these platforms content. Either on the cellphone or laptop anywhere anytime or at home on the desktop possibly in private.
Oh no my child saw porn but who's fault really is it? The atform and its creators or mine own for being so careless?
thanks, was gonna ask the same. . . lol
With all respect, @tekraze, I personally believe, that this counts far more as an educational piece, than anything . . .
The post did not have any nudity, or graphic explanations of any kind about sexual nature.
I think these kind of sharings may even help the younger generations, to see sexuality in a different way, and not just what they secretly watch behind their parents back.
Most kids who are are on Blurt (although I don't know any of them, so if any of them reading this, pls raise your hand, and let me know what you think), they also probably watch porn, which is far less about reality, than anything that @lucylin shared here.
This is more about speaking openly, and observing it from many angles, as well as have converations about differrent views, rather than show something, such as porn, that is more often than not, is far away from reality (i might have a very boring sex life though, so will only speak for myself).
My points are:
But tell me if i am unaware of any rules that are written in the blurt database, and i have dismissed. . . cause it can well be the case. thanks
Personally i would put the #epistem tag on, rather than nsfw.
sorry to hijack the convo @yayogerado
Hi, I meant for all the recent posts, not just this one. And we were looking at the use of an NSFW tag, but no, all posts were added the same.
I don't have a family here or kids, so I don't have any issues with the content.
But here we have kids, and all topics sound educational but explicit content is not good.
Let's say Even if I agree, that the piece is educational, still, some people might have problems with that seeing in the open.
They may not even browser here anymore, seeing there is no filter.
This was not meant to offend anyone, but if anyone is offended, I am not sorry. But I am out of it, as I love peace.
Bye
I wasn't offended, just curious. Still learning . . .
Sending peace and love brother. 🙏🏻💗
Yes ! yes!, and yes again !
@tekraze and @saboin for president(s).... !!!
I'll be using this screen shot for many, many, future comments on various accounts - that do indeed get offended by free speech...
You've set a great example with your wise words, my friend.
More of this please !
Thanks.
No offense was ever taken. Did not even notice anything offensive by your words. I don't believe there was any after looking at it objectively.
I was only looking for clarification.
This post is not NSFW... except maybe for trannies who work at kindergartens, they only allow content about anal and ban all mention of hetro sex...