RE: Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Self upvoting for witnesses ONLY - A proposal....For the future growth of Blurt.

in blurtlife •  3 years ago 

Ahhh... Thank you very much, now I have a much clearer picture about your jury idea.

There are some things in the very background of my mind though who give an "alarm" about it but I am not quite sure what those thoughts are trying me to tell.

I might come back to it.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

thx, I've read it. I don't know, if understood it yet. I may need to come back to these very ideas but have lack of interest at the moment. Like I mentioned, for some reason I feel uneasy about them but have to find out what it may be.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

also, the person "flagging" or "reporting" would pay the bounty for the juror's participation

if the jury votes to remove the content (the agree the flag is valid), half the bounty would go to the jurors and half would be returned to the reporter

if the jury votes to NOT remove the content (false flag), half the bounty would go to the jurors and half would be "burned" (to disincentivize false reporting)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com