What you cite as moral and ethical - much of which I can go along with - is sabotaged by yourself again the moment you jump on the stories of others who are upset about some other person and morally discredit them. Very bad idea.
From my perspective, you vastly underestimate that the messages you send out into the world will always be interpreted by the receiver and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it if someone insists on their interpretation. Just as I, for example, am unlikely to convince you that I think your postings are self-sabotage in many ways.
You have complained long, often and rampantly that your source of income on hive has dried up, now you are again putting yourself to bed with problems that, as I see it, nobody can solve. By "nobody" I mean the coders or founders of a platform like this. I find your strategy in this regard counterproductive in terms of the small income you need to live, which would seem to be quite achievable/or already sufficient for you here. When are you going to learn that the whole thing can be gamed because what on the one hand makes the game possible is also what makes it conflict-prone? You are the only one who can make peace with that.
You call for the operators and want them to make an example of Opidia (or whoever you are targeting) for what they are doing here on the blockchain as immoral, at the same time you are committing an immoral act yourself (your blind spot?). On the one hand you appeal to an authority (funny that you don't see that) on the other hand you reject it when it then appears and disagrees with you.
Hence my question: what if the founder of blurt had agreed with you? What if he had actually called the user exploitative and misbehaving, publicly? Would you be satisfied with that, and what do you think, is it right that anyone could be publicly pilloried in this way at any time, something that the opponents of the so-called new world order are constantly warning about: the fight between people on a horizontal level.
But of course, if the people want individuals from among them to be put on display, the people will get it. After all, even the Roman theatre and the marketplaces of the Middle Ages had full ranks, didn't they? It seems that morality is not at its best everywhere. Yours, too.
May I give you some advice? I would leave all the moralising alone for once.
As you always say, I only want to help. HaHa! You could start paying me for it. :D
Every solution to a problem creates its own new problems. No matter what it is, it will always go on like this, because there is no such thing as a final solution, no final "we are all satisfied now". I find it easy to see that this is so. Don't you?
...Growing food, keeping healthy, looking after my doggies, looking after some old gits who can't cook for themselves (I cook three or four times a week for 'em)....and then there's Luce of course (who doesn't have any philosophical perspectives of life, whatsoever)...All keeps me well grounded*.
You need not convince me that you are a good person. If you believe in yourself, it shall suffice. But as you mentioned it, why don't you publish those things and give some stories about the cookings and the encounters you have? Tell some real life stories? You think, they are uninteresting? Then make them entertaining. Ask those people from real life encounters funny/unusual questions and tell about it. I mean, why not?