This movie is so underrated. The simplest comic accurate Hulk in my opinion. Don't get me wrong, Mark Ruffalo is well tolerable but Edward Norton did such an excellent job portraying what it's wish to accept the Hulk, and at the top he realizes that sometimes, in certain situations, people are gonna need the Hulk and learns to Embrace him. But within the 1st avengers, they went straight back to the self deprecating and moody Hulk and fast forward a touch , they create him into one big green joke. A minimum of during this movie, I can see Hulk and Bruce Banner with nothing but respect
source
I loved this movie. This is often the version of the Incredible Hulk that I wish that they had kept throughout the MCU. That's not a small on Mark Ruffalo, his version of the Hulk is sweet to but once you compare the 2 , CGI quality aside, this version of the Hulk is meaner, stronger and appears more sort of a monster. The story is pretty average, nothing overly special but the action sequences are well done and you actually do get a way of the Hulks strength. Edward Norton played the role of Bruce Banner well i assumed but the standout during this film on behalf of me was William Hurt as General Thunderbolt Ross, he did an incredible job and no wonder he stayed on to continue portraying the character within the MCU. My favourite scene was the top fight between Abomination and Hulk, the particular end of the fight itself was a touch little bit of a disappointed but the initiate thereto and therefore the back and forward feats of strength were fun to observe .
The film is EXTREMELY underrated. It does actually set the origin of Bruce Banner within the mcu but with more efficiency;in the opening credits. People also say they scrap his arc over from the film, but later actor Mark Ruffalo said how he was CONTINUING Nortons performance. I prefer how, once you check out it, Banner starts off as a traditional scientist, gets hulked up and becomes dangerous, joins a team but still remains considerably a rage monster,escapes off the world and develops a personality more.
Avengers:Endgame got much higher critical ratings and were overall liked better by the overall public. But i feel it gets a nasty rap. The CGI graphics are stunning and therefore the areas look beautiful. I also love the planning for the Hulk. While Mark Ruffalo may be a better Bruce Banner and Hulk,I still love Edward Norton's portrayal of the character. He depicts Banner as a scientist who has been living within the shadows,and he executes it alright. And Tim Roth's portrayal of Emil Blondskey and therefore the Abomanation was done amazingly. Liv Tyler and William Hurt executed their roles as Betty and General Ross during a good way. The teaser at the top for the Leader and Tony Stark's appearance within the post credit scene made me love the movie even more.
A really underrated movie. I actually liked the dark and gritty tone of this movie. this is often how the hulk was meant to be like, not the goofy and kinder garden one we came endgame. Disney just ruined hulk's presence on screen.
Final Verdict: it isn't the best movie within the MCU but it's far better than some critic reviews lead you to believe. It doesn't really play an excessive amount of of a task within the MCU anymore either as you'll easily bypass it and still understand and luxuriate in every other film within the franchise. In saying that, I reccomend this film to all or any superhero or magazine fans as it is a great interpretation of the Incredible Hulk with some decent action.