Magic Money Everywhere

in blurtart •  last month 







Both of these music videos, Magic Money Everywhere and Mountains of Data, were completely created by neural network.


I have been publishing content generated by neural networks for over a year, and during this time I have involuntarily managed to collect a huge amount of feedback, including non-verbal (likes/dislikes, subscriptions/unsubscriptions, etc.). Today, AI-content is present in all social networks, and communities of interested people have managed to form in most of them. It is all the more surprising to encounter rejection of such content, sometimes reaching the level of AI-phobia.

I think, despite all the hackneyed and overused, the word "phobia" in this case is ideal, because AI-denial is based on fear. Not a conscious fear of something specific and formed, but a fear of change as such. As a person who lived through the collapse of several state regimes (let me not specify), I understand these feelings completely. However, this does not add a drop of logic to the fear of AI-generated content, because everything bad that could happen to "real human creativity" happened a long time ago - not in our day and not even in our century.

Photography. Today it is considered absolutely conventional human content, isn't it? Especially against the background of AI-pictures that are created in one click. But is a photo created any differently? It is the same click (okay, more often it is not a click, but a tap), it just happens in a different application. Just in a different app, you understand? Close "I Am Cool Artist" app, activate "I Am Cool Photographer" app, point the camera at the object, poke your finger in the right place - voila, your creative act has taken place, you can publish photo, collecting well-deserved likes for "real user-generated content". Oh, what is this, it turns out that you did not close the first app, but only minimized it, and your tap on the screen accidentally caused the generation of a new picture? Oh nooo, this is not a real picture, it is artificial. Unlike the photo, yeah.
I hope that I did not offend anyone with this "mental sketch", I just wanted to demonstrate the entire conventionality of the modern understanding of what is "human-made" and what is not.

Once upon a time, drawing portraits or just "pictures for interior decoration" was a very popular business, and today it is a thing of the past, but painting as a high art will remain with humanity forever. Of course, this activity will no longer be widespread. Instead of painting, photography has become widespread, it has intercepted this initiative and will not give it up. The creation of AI-images only complements this picture. You can lament that humanity no longer needs a million real living artists, but I will repeat once again: this process was not started by neural networks. A lot of different professions, both creative and not so creative, suffered in a similar way, starting with coachmen, millers, stonemasons - no, I doubt I'll be able to get to the very source of this story. It began too long ago. Not today, not yesterday, not in this century and not in this millennium. The main thing is that this story does not end, because this, unlike the biographies of kings, unlike the chronologies of wars, is the real history of humanity called progress.



Sources
My YouTube channel
Music and lyrics - Suno
Graphics - Dreamlike




Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last month  ·  

There is certainly a phobia towards art created with AI, many call it plagiarism since AIs have been trained with the content of thousands of human artists, however you cannot call the content plagiarism since it is not copying, what the AI ​​is doing is "synthesizing", and also starting from a prompt or another image or the lyrics of a song written by the user.

I am particularly fascinated by art created with AI, I love creating images from intricate prompts or from my own sketches or digital works, I also have an account on suno where I have created songs of various styles.

Congratulations on your creations, I hope you continue moving forward despite the "phobias" of others, hehe.

  ·  29 days ago  ·  

many call it plagiarism since AIs have been trained with the content of thousands of human artists

I wonder how these critics think ordinary people learn. Are we born with all the skills we need, from painting with watercolors to performing heart surgery? Oops, no. People learn from other people, humanity is made up of plagiarists 😀

what the AI ​​is doing is "synthesizing"

This is exactly how the creative process happens in living people: 90% of the assimilated "base" + 10% of their own rethinking. And this is in the best case, in the most innovative creative personalities. Most "creators" do not make any personal contribution at all, therefore, for example, 99% of writers are forgotten immediately after death. I think that this percentage is even higher for musicians. And there is nothing sad about this, it is the norm.

People who jealously guard the "purity of creativity" simply do not understand what we are talking about, they themselves have never composed or created anything. Therefore, they pretend to be some kind of crusaders, it seems to them that their life acquires more meaning such way. God be with them, as long as they do not burn anyone at the stake, all this can be tolerated 🙂

Thank you for your kind words and good luck!

  ·  last month  ·  


** Your post has been upvoted (41.53 %) **