Substack shadow bans its users for political reasons

in blurt •  last year  (edited)

I have various subscriptions I get by email from certain authors in substack that are not "politically correct" and I came across something interesting in this censorship game.

I thought substack would be a great place to start blogging but when this type of stuff happens, why bother support it?

ad28144c-d48c-4fa2-a9a7-4228363f7873_620x930.jpg

It appears that this blog is under attack by way of Substack’s control over how everything runs here. Now I think I know exactly what THEY were the most upset about. Since the last post they have fixed it where, at least when I look at it, the welcome page that lists my most popular entries flashes by in an instant and goes directly to the chronological listing.

That means the two 88/ Lahaina/Oprah pieces, in particular, are now buried down in the listings instead of being on the very top of the popularity listings people would see if they didn’t just flash by. Those pieces plus my last post are my most liked pieces to date. Those pieces are what triggered this apparently. Could it be this? I called this a Phoenix ritual representation of the headwound of The Beast of Revelations, in the 88/Lahaina post.

Source

What in turn is happening is that substack is altering notifications and emails for the subscribers. So that they miss out on new publications from their favorite authors. So now the subscribers would be forced to take extra unnecessary steps to just get access which defeats the purpose of the original design of substack.

When one subscribes to an author, they get emails as they come published. But since substackbis altering purposely their subscriptions for political reasons, to hold narratives.... well lets just say it won't end well long term for substack if they keep this up.

Censorship is never a good financial move and this type of censorship will cause people to leave their platform. Which is probably what they want anyways but what gets left behind is a dull grey echo chamber.

Take our sister chain Hive for example.

How many left that pro censorship dystopia cesspool for Blurt?

But Blurt is not that far from it. Sure it doesn't have the downvote, but most of the front ends excluding blurtlatam.intinte.org has a biased mute functionality. The comment section IS PUBLIC SPACE. To mute someone woumd be to not see who you are muting. That is fine. You can shut your own eyes if you want. But the way it is set up in blurt.blog, beblurt, blurt.one, and every single one in this list has the mute function to not only shield your eyes but of those who visit the public space of your publication. Which is immoral. Just because someone provides a tool forncensorshiping others doesn't mean it should be used. There is a better option.

Boycotting.

clickable images
9f43004660a7334fe99a4cc38a2a9e10d1a76155.gif

Screenshot_20230830-200647_Proton Mail.jpg

ODYSEE Decentralized Video Platform

FREE BTC

New to Blurt? Profit from your rewards with Non KYC Ionomy and StealthEX to keep your identity protected.
yellow-970x250.png


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last year  ·  

Algo con lo que yo no estar jamás de acuerdo es con ley mordaz en cualquier lugar, sabido ser que tener derecho a privacidad, respeto, elección, pero esto no ser mismo que querer manipular como corderos y más si sitio ofrecer el lema LIBRE DE CENSURA. No necesitar que nos digan qué hacer ni qué leer porque para eso poder hacerlo yo misma, para eso ser cada persona adulta con criterio.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Asi es.

Fue un gusto leer tu comentario. Gracias por el reblurt.

De verdad opino lo mismo. No somos niños pero aun existe idiotas en posiciones en poder que piensan que son capaces de guir nuestro atencion a natrativos controlados con derecho. Aunque en este caso el poder que tienen es censurar informativo sobre sus favoritos autores.

Que opinas que deberian hacer los que gustan leer del substack cuando descubren que pueden, y lo hacen, sostener las notificaciones de autores no políticas correctas?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Was following Peter McCoullough on there but never trusted the platform. Anything with a CDN is subject to political interference

  ·  last year  ·  

Yeah, I was downvoted to oblivion on Hive. No more rewards, everything grayed out and hidden, no visibility, etc. I joined Blurt just in time to lose the last of my earnings to the Blurt price crash. I've put in 15+ years of full-time content creation effort and have nothing to show for it, not even a following, because I've been shadowbanned and censored off every major (and semi-major) platform. The bad guys have won and the good guys aren't even allowed to talk about it openly.

As for Substack, I heard about it for the first time a few months ago. I was considering making a profile but if they're towing the official narrative then NAAAAHHHHHHH.

Congratulations! 🏆

You have recieved a coconutty upvote! 🥥
Thank you for contributing to the Blurt Blockchain!
Keep up the great work!

Curated by @outofthematrix!

A little reminder: I am a top 20 Blurt witness, sooo please help me stay there!

Please consider taking a moment to vote for my witness, if you haven't already done so!
You can do this by logging into your wallet with your active key! 🗳️
It only takes a few seconds and doesn't cost a cent!
https://blurtwallet.com/~witnesses?highlight=outofthematrix