I think we should give you....@drutter the keys the blurt booster account! and I'm dead serious. I've mentioned I'm not a fan of bots curating for reasons pointed out in your post.
I really don't think the word corruption is totally appropriate. That puts people on the defensive and implies people are purposely being nefarious, when often (not always) that is not the case.
Perfect example. I've been given the keys to the coconut curration account along with 2 other people, and often the account sits at 100% vote power, because simply, I barely have enough time to even keep up my own presence here with my own account. Same issue with the people I'm sharing it with.
Hence bots come in, people are short on time. Not a good solution. We can do better. ;)
As for me and my availability, this has not always been the case. About 6 months ago, I had plenty of time. But these days I'm taking on a lot of projects outside of blurt and in the real world here in Thailand, like playing around with all sorts of weed! hahaha
But again, if you have the time. I absolutely will push to have you personally be a solution to some of these problems. You've proven yourself to be smart, pro blurt, and trustworthy. 100% I would love to see you running a huge curation account on the platform.
Maybe we can get some momentum behind this idea, if you are up for it....
Thanks for your reply Dan!
Regarding "corruption", to those whom it does not truly apply, then it is not them I am talking about. To those whom it does apply, then they are rightly included. There's some corruption going on, that's pretty clear to me. Who/where/how it is exactly happening, I'm not entirely privy to. Perhaps this is a start at finding out.
Glad you are a fan of Khrom too! I like him, as well as Fervi, yourself, Tom, and a few other witnesses. There are good people here.
I don't know how/if the Blurtbooster thing would work out, but thank you for suggesting that, and we can look at the details if you think it's worthwhile.
Have a great day.