But vts is not a crime? Honesty I f people don’t like vts why don’t they change the coding? Or make some actual rules around it. I personally don’t mind at all certain rules in place to make a site better but they have to be listed upfront so there is a clear understanding of what is breaking them. It seems like vts is ok but people don’t like it when people make over a certain amount doing it? Have I understood that right?
RE: End these freeze rumors right now! 🍡 Beendet endlich diese Einfriergerüchte! ENG/GER
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
End these freeze rumors right now! 🍡 Beendet endlich diese Einfriergerüchte! ENG/GER
You are not getting my point.
Vts is not a crime, but if you build up stake with VTS and then someone.trying to do same.
You start to say we do not use VTS. VTS are bad,
I mean one should not say this, but this happened. All users who used Vts themselves startes treating other people like criminals.
In the end its all about money.
But people can say whatever they like really and if vts is a thing that’s allowed on the chain they can even use it and speak bad about it. That’s their prerogative on a free speech site which, blurt claims to be.
I’ve acrually myself supported the notion of getting rid of vts or making it less favourable but that would be through code or site rules clearly laid out in advance. I absolutely do not support just randomly deciding to freeze certain accounts because of things that are infact legal and considered ok according to site rules. Then taking it back two days later upon seeing how unpopular it is. There are much better ways to go about trying to change the tactics of big investors and I personally believe using code and technology is the way that doesn’t involve personal opinion and emotions getting the better of people. My personal stance is I am ok with site rules clearly laid out I just don’t like making up the rules as people go along based on the personal opinion of 2/3 people.
Yepp right, sorry I missed this from you.