I’m not judging I’m simply expressing I noticed the exact change in you that you are explaining yourself. I even said I understand why you have to be that way. I also said in many ways I respect it too because I don’t think witnesses should
Rly be arguing back and forwards in the comments and should be more focused on official statements so I’m not really sayinr anything other than I have observed certain things and I understand why that might be the case. I’m also just saying I hope you remember your values going in and the reason we all voted for you.
RE: Message to @jacobgadikian and the Blurt Community
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Message to @jacobgadikian and the Blurt Community
My values are the following:
I mean I partly agree with markey but then you as well it seems all these sites have a bit of a block on actually infiltrating a change of opinion within the ranks or bringing in opposite perspectives. I think it is natural if I put myself in megadrives shoes would I want someone arguing with me all the time? Probably not but it is actually healthy otherwise this pattern will continually repeat of things being released to the public and suddenly realising how unpopular and bad an idea was after all. It’s a strong thing to have no people around you but it’s probably pretty healthy in business.
This is what I have to do more and more and.... 😉
Yeah but there was a lot more after the but. Being in business isn’t always fun. It seems like there is a complete dictatorship and you fall in line or your out. Kinda like I felt energetically. Damn. That’s not so bad for a product like a soft drink where the founder has a strong vision but a blockchain social media thats supposed to function on consensus ... not so good. Maybe blurt needs to just decide what it is as a platform it seems somewhat confused and I think that’s the issue.