tbh I am neither pro or anti vax, I actually support peoples right to get it if they want it that bad, I just don't want it, like I don't want a flu jab or I don't want ketchup on my fries. What I am against is anti freedom of choice and passports.
RE: Pro-Vaxx vs Anti-Vaxx #DareToThink
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Pro-Vaxx vs Anti-Vaxx #DareToThink
Here is my issue,
If you knew something was a BioWeapon do you think people should have the choice to take a known BioWeapon?
Also this BioWeapon from pfizer has the ability to shed on to innocent bystanders.
Pfizer says that all people exposed to their drug should avoid sexual contact for at least 3 months with pregnant women or women planning to get pregnant and to report any birth defects that occur.
They give an example if your boyfriend has been exposed by someone else who was injected then your boyfriend could cause harm to your unborn child. Like day your boyfriend plays basketball with a person injected with the drug.
Do you think that your fellow man should have the choice to put you in danger and your unborn child by accepting an experimental defective gene injection aka BioWeapon?
Yeah I do tbh. I think you can warn them, post about it etc and present them with facts but ultimately yes I believe in free choice. If people want to choose suicide or take selfies off cliffs that’s also their choice. Take the manufacturers to court yes but stopping people taking something they want to take i disagree there. I fight for free choice not force.
Yea I get personal choice but I feel there has to be some personal responsibility also to not hurt others.
Self harm and suicide definitely is a choice.
My example is different because the person would be putting others at risk by spreading a transmissible harmful toxic drug.
So at the moment people are injecting themselves with radioactive nanoparticles and then comes into close contact with others and due to constant nucleation happening in their body they can can expose other people to radioactive nanoparticles.
This process would be hurting and killing others around them because they chose to get radioactive ionized nanoparticles injected into their body that produced more radioactive nanoparticles so basically becoming a walking BioWeapon.
Personally I don't think that choice should be allowed and I feel like it's a massive issue that people ignore even though the drug companies admit to providing this specific type of transmissable harmful drug.
Its ok to talk about people that did not inject themselves with a transmisable drug and calling them spreaders of natual germs but drug shedding is completely ignored yet it is a real harmful thing that exists and is known to cause suffering and death directly by the drug company that produces and sells the harmful transmissible drug product.
https://rumble.com/vst08o-karen-kingston-proof-the-vaccines-were-created-to-kill-children.html
At the end of the day they have the same opinion that us not getting vaccinated is harming them, bullshit or not we’ll fight all day if we keep trying to force one another not to do what they want to do with their own bodies. However, if someone can prove beyond doubt and take it to court that the vaccine is a danger then people will on the most part stop having it. So rather than ban people from having something they want it should be taken up with the people producing the vaccine who are lying
Link to my original post about this info