NFSW - Not safe for who?

Not safe for who? Only for megadrive. Let's take a look at an interesting post by the man who is usually more focused on Freedom of Speech Jacob Gadikian, in one of his posts many years ago he had an interesting reflection about nudity and pornographic elements. It is important to mention that this founder can agree with using some elements of pornography in your publications without affecting a person's rights, or better yet establishing that very explicit elements of pornography are labeled as NFSW. The interesting thing about this article is that it shows us the hypocrisy of the foundation by automatically placing all of an author's content as NFSW, which articles break this rule? Which ones show explicit pornographic elements? Showing a breast? Buttocks? Yes Jacob has used flying penises in his posts and was not censored or labeled as NFSW, nor was he accused of breaking the rules.

I wouldn't be comfortable adding a nudity filter to image uploads, that is a blunt instrument.

This is nothing more than another arbitrary move by a desperate man that there is no need to implement on the platform just to keep everything in his power so he doesn't get criticized. Draw your conclusions after reading the attached post and write whether the crazy penguin's posts should be labeled by the foundation as NFSW content.

read this

https://blurt.blog/blurt/@jacobgadikian/finally-some-boobs

@ctime , @mariuszkarowski,