Yeah, the same guy who just abused me, just because I was in trending and he is not. He is just an investor, but it does not make him an owner. He is the part of same community as any other person.
He may have money, but we people have invested time and we do not need someone abusing us and at the same time telling us what to do.
Don't keep taking sides like these.
Enough with your investor thing every time.
Is anyone on the blurt team actually able to converse like an adult? I have never seen such fragile egos in my life that feel abused at every turn and corner and can’t just scroll past a few negative posts when they are supposed to be in an official role? Imagine if Mark z came on and started arguing with the users over a meme someone posted of him on fb. He would be considered a complete joke. I think you guys should rly step back from any public engagement and leave it to @world-travel-pro before blurt is worth 0
How much more do you really need to know about their mindsets?
smh...
@ultravioletmag:
Mark Zuckerberg recives millions of negative messages. He recently talked about it and you must read about it. It affects him too.
But like a professional he does not get involved. Have you ever seen him argue with a user ? Have you seen him spend hours and days and months of his time trying to take down one user? No and that is Why fb is popular and blurt is going down.
Errr... You must read more about Facebook. The FB team does a lot and Blurt hasn't done anything.
The fb team has done some terrible stuff with silencing our vaccine and alt truth posts and people hate it and fb is losing users constantly. It however has never gone after someone for saying mean things about mark z. These sites are meant to be better than fb not worse!!!
True FB does that. Blurt on the other hand doesn't do it and Blurt is home to some really good truthers and they use this platform to share their truth.
Have you guys ever watched spitting images? I suggest you go take a look. It has gruesome puppets of popular celebrities and government figures it was a huge show in I think the 90s. It rly took the piss out of politicians, even the queen and royalty but everyone loved it and everyone who had a puppet made of them took it on the chin. That’s how blurt need to see lucylins posts as a bit of fun satire and leave him the hell alone while blurt has some value.
I haven't see it but I'll see the video soon. I understand satire and I don't let it bother me. Not everyone can handle it. Politicians and public figures always have to toughen up. It does effect them but they learn to move on.
The witnesses or the team on Blurt aren't politicians or actors. They are just normal people with coding or other skills that hardly requires them to interact with humans.
Anyways, I get your point and let me clarify it once more that the team is working harder now to add more features and to bring more people to Blurt.
Let the team do their work. Let them build something better. If someone doesn't like Blurt.blog then use Blurtlatam.
Or even better they can build their own frontends and remove the mute feature, run it the way they like.
And those interested can join hands with the team and help in different ways.
Constructive feedback is always welcome.
Lucy isn't the focus now. Vote trading Services are the focus.
This is the new version. People actually were flattered to get puppets
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ndSj1bbjPToIt