I tried, but i see your fear. The ones you saying major investors are the ones who caused the issue at start
They were in power, they were earning. But then people started earning, same ways they do, they then started abusing those people using that. And to that i mean VTS, those all who were against are the ones who used VTS to get a big stake.
Not even that, they were the ones who first threaten and abused users to go away.
They were the ones mistreating community.
And if you still cry for their investment, i feel like no one can save community. They will keep building their stakes and keep abusing the power and rule.
It does not necessarily make one investor good,just for their stake of money.
Probably my last comment to you. I don't feel wasting any more time explaining this to you all who think we threatened the investors
Then write a code to stop vts it’s elt that simple don’t single handedly push off the big investors by continually making empty threats then changing your mind. Code is law not you. That’s really the whole point of blockchain no?
Vts are not bad, but how people use that. And that's what happens when.you try to explain things, people miss main issue like you did now.
Go read it again
If vts is something legal and able to be done on the site then they have every right to do it. If you don’t like it remove the ability to use vts. You have people in your core team like opidia who pretty much 100’percent upvote is that rly any different?
Self votes are not crime, you can also do that.
Opidia is not a core team member
But vts is not a crime? Honesty I f people don’t like vts why don’t they change the coding? Or make some actual rules around it. I personally don’t mind at all certain rules in place to make a site better but they have to be listed upfront so there is a clear understanding of what is breaking them. It seems like vts is ok but people don’t like it when people make over a certain amount doing it? Have I understood that right?
You are not getting my point.
Vts is not a crime, but if you build up stake with VTS and then someone.trying to do same.
You start to say we do not use VTS. VTS are bad,
I mean one should not say this, but this happened. All users who used Vts themselves startes treating other people like criminals.
In the end its all about money.
But people can say whatever they like really and if vts is a thing that’s allowed on the chain they can even use it and speak bad about it. That’s their prerogative on a free speech site which, blurt claims to be.
I’ve acrually myself supported the notion of getting rid of vts or making it less favourable but that would be through code or site rules clearly laid out in advance. I absolutely do not support just randomly deciding to freeze certain accounts because of things that are infact legal and considered ok according to site rules. Then taking it back two days later upon seeing how unpopular it is. There are much better ways to go about trying to change the tactics of big investors and I personally believe using code and technology is the way that doesn’t involve personal opinion and emotions getting the better of people. My personal stance is I am ok with site rules clearly laid out I just don’t like making up the rules as people go along based on the personal opinion of 2/3 people.
Yepp right, sorry I missed this from you.