The idea hasn't changed at all really. Blurt community will be composed of exactly NOT the kind of people who make such charming remarks as the post you screenshotted at the top of your article.

"Social money for enemies" relates to the fact that in this chain, you can't use your money as a weapon. The idea is that if that's what gets you going, to harass and irritate, and, for extra bonus points, pay script kiddies to poke at people's other social media accounts or go after their associates - yeah, you can go do that somewhere else. Or you can pay the developers/witnesses/promoters for the privilege like anyone else.

Nothing stopping asshats from posting trolly comments on people, posting nasty memes, doxxing, whatever... they just will be helping the community with your fees and we are laughing at them. I personally think that we should not change fees from funding the DAO/foundation. The disincentive to spend ill-gotten scammy, spammy wealth from the other graphene chains should remain, in my opinion.

There is absolutely nothing positive to say about platforms that facilitate spam, trolling, and especially not circle jerking. We want to avoid circle jerk also, because we are allies here, not friends. We are on the same side, not in the same family. Some people get caught up in a cultish '(insert chain name) fam' and the environment does tend towards encouraging this kind of creepy nonsense.

It's social money for enemies, because you can be very opposed to some other person or group, but instead of hurling shit at them, you have to be a lot more creative to undermine or milk them. The downvotes and spammy trolly posts are 5 year old grade. Clever, double entendre and sarcastic is how civilised people deal with stupidity in other people.

AND

most importantly, there is no such thing as friends. I defer to Nassim Taleb on this: