It will be the 6th hardfork if I am not mistaken. And here are some recap to what will happen this day.
I have no clue where you dug that up. We're currently on HF 7 and working on HF 8 to possibly have it ready for the end of July, but there isn't currently any specific date.
The regent was due to expire on 2022/07/04. That was coded in from the beginning. And the DAO proposal from socialgraph will end on 2022/07/07, but that has nothing to do with any hardfork. That's just the date of expiry of the current proposal by socialgraph.
Socialgraph will probably put in a new proposal, but make it much smaller so that there are funds left for other accounts to put in proposals and get a chance to be funded.
This was all going to happen regardless. A few people have made a mountain out of a molehill. For what purpose? I'll let you make your own speculations.
Lol from github but i must have been looking at old files... so HF7it is then. And you said possibly on July, alright that is different than what I have been getting via word of mouth from many other users. Thank you for clarifying. But the ending date and the hf8 possible due date is at the same month.
What other radical changes are to happen with HF8? And what can we expect to happen soon as the HF8 is operational?
The three things that change for HF 8 (so far) are the following:
Deleverage witness voting:
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/-/issues/119
Some changes to the proposal system:
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/-/issues/121
The removal of witness/governance proxy:
https://gitlab.com/blurt/blurt/-/issues/175
We don't know when it will be ready and then we have to see if the witnesses accept it. We will have announcements when it gets closer to the date of completion.
You can look through the issues on GitLab to see what other things have been proposed in the past, but haven't made it yet. And you can look at the closed issues to see things that have either changed or been rejected in the past.
I think these account can be easily reactivated after their expirations?
The only one that is going inactive is @blurt.regent, see saboins comments.
And that is entirely possible. Maybe they will use it for something else?
"A few people have made a mountain out of a molehill. For what purpose? I'll let you make your own speculations" Is there a foundation or is there not? This is the problem "the few have" as not 1 of you gives a clear and concise answer, as the "blurt club" of tech people seem very confused, is there? Or is there not? Simple question.
No foundation in the legal sense. Meaning there is no registration. Its not required to start a blockchain. Just computers and a human to operate it. There is no "Corp" in operation here apart from voluntary funding from investors and voluntary work from devs who could get a better job if they wanted it. But they must really believe in what they are doing to stay this long. Its just people like you and me working as an organized group.
According to @offgridlife $175,000 is the going rate on here to run things, per year, I have no idea about that, possibly talk to him, hence why I added the @ before his name, I want to see you all do well, it would be nice if everyone got a slice of the pie, I can only hope, and have enough myself to see me to old age and death, so be it. Have a superb ride, you deserve it. In a nice way.
Lol I muted him along time ago for his spamming and I think he muted me before that since he mever responds to me.
Lol, he does post a lot.
In hive he would be muted for spamming the chain lol. Blurt is pretty laid back in comparison. Which is why I liked the mute function. Why send to coal when i van just either not follow, not vote and mute and be done. The earth continues to spin as the saying goes.
He shit posts alot. Thats what bugged me.
You are not the first to say that.
....is there a mute list? (link?)
Yes. Your own personal muted list can be found in settings.
I meant like the steemit muted list- users who have muted you...?
Ah. No clue on that one.
@saboin is there a way to see who has muted me or nil?