Firstly, you actually have reward payouts again, else you wouldn't be asking this. Rejoice!
I have written about this before - here and here - but, as it now manifests, let me go through this briefly again.
Once the various UI/frontends update their economic codes, you should receive the same payouts in your wallet as are estimated on the various Blurt websites. So, in the near future there should be no sudden "drop" in the payouts compared to the estimates.
One of the key features of the new economic system is that it is responsive to the amount of Blurt that is actually participating in the economy - and that's vested, or powered-up, BLURT. The more BLURT is powered-up, the higher the percentage of the reward pool that gets paid out.
At the moment, this is almost exactly 50%, hence you will see your wallet payouts seem like half of what it looked like on your blog. Nothing has been "lost", just that the platforms have not as yet updated their scripts as HF5 is very new.
Notice also that the reward pool is now about 60% larger than it was a week ago. This is, of course, due to the unfortunate zero-payouts, but I expected it to grow anyway, so what we are seeing is a somewhat speeded-up version of what I thought would happen.
What we will achieve in the end is a new balance, with a larger rpool producing larger rewards that are then scaled back down to reflect the active Blurt economy. Why bother? Because this avoids the unfortunate game in play on other similar chains, whereby new members shrink the pool for existing members. In Blurt's new economy, new members who buy BLURT and power-up should be appreciated as they will slightly increase the payouts to everyone. The effects may be small and slow but they are real.
On top of this, please also notice that small BP holders now have a meaningful vote! They are no longer stuck on voting for 0.00 rewards. You can check this yourself: just try a small vote like 1%.
The third economic change can also be seen already in action. We changed the reward-curve so that it better reflects the Blurt economy in Vests. There is now a slight curve upwards, so that higher votes are worth slightly more. It should not be as dramatic as on other chains, and I will monitor this. The curation-curve has been left unchanged, as per the request of most users who expressed a preference.
Now that we know how to change the economic levers, the various formulas can be changed in the future. However, the economic game must be allowed to reach its own equilibrium. Only if it appears to be heading towards some unfortunate terminus should we intervene.
There is a Part 2 coming, but that depends on designing it and seeing whether it is best tested on Blurt or some future new chain. This is, in some ways, a preparation for it, to test that the reward pool will behave as predicted.
All of the above is predicated on current activity. I truly hope that we can encourage members to return and new members to join, so that a more vibrant environment will lead to more posting and voting and... a smaller rpool :-) And, it will also mean a higher percentage of that pool will be paid out!
Build Blurt Better!
Please vote for my witness account @busbecq.
Can be done directly here.
Thanks!
Congratulations to HF5!
And thank you very much for your explanations and all your work!
I hope BLURT will grow!
And thanks for your help too, both on the platform and behind the scenes.
Thank you for this news, especially because it speaks of the precise changes that are already being experienced and will be experienced in the near future.
Thanks, yes, although I get tired of writing the same thing, I know it is necessary to keep reminding people as things happen - especially without reblurts it is hard to spread info.
Thanks, I made a post with the information of what is happening, I also added a link to this one for you to read it first hand. It is important to have the community in general informed of what is happening. I also think that we should give some time for the blockchain to stabilize in order to bring new users.
many thanks, and yes, onboarding new members can wait, even though BLURT is very cheap, but may be worth prodding those members who joined and maybe left, especially those who saw their modest BP yield 0.00 upvotes, now can participate more fully.
Awesome. This is good to know.... great work as always ! I’m working on bringing a lot more people to Blurt.
yeah thx, a huge sigh of relief all round methinks!
Let's let these economic changes produce the desired social changes - give it some time.
Thank you for the effort @rycharde ant the rest of the team, I have just received reward that's great.
This means the curation still in 50%-50%?
Will this part includes the curation of having the blurt liquid as what have been planned before HF3? for me as usual is fine but having blurt liquid in the reward might also help us convince new users to join with us.
You have mixed up three different issues:
yes, it's still 50-50 split;
yes, the curation curve itself has not been changed, hence still almost time-independent linear curation-rewards;
and curation has always been distributed as 100% BP, different to the author-rewards being split between BP and liquid BLURT - no, that has nothing to do with "Part 2" as currently designed.
Thank you. This is a huge game changer. The other chains love the dust as it shifts those tiny slivers that cumulatively add up to large amounts shifting back to their controlling stake.
Thanks, my only slight fear is people doing microvotes that cost them more in fees than they earn! lmao. Honestly, I used to call this the Paying Attention Economy (PAE), maybe I should start using it again - in contrast to the so-called "attention economy" which is advertisers begging you not to leave.
I never understood the microvotes I would get at Hive and Steem. They seemed a waste of time for all involved. Not to mention if one is here in the US, dependent on how often one collected this could really become an accounting nightmare for taxes. I make sure since joining here to collect rewards only once per day and put the lump sum in my spreadsheet. Even then its a hassle that I'll need to probably figure out myself come time to file. A tax professional could easily eat up (or more) the gains made from what is gained here. Unless moon of course, but I try to keep my head out of the clouds after 3 years of no mooning at this. Low expectations equals no disappointment worst case, nice surprise best case.
It seems that (for now) the rewards have lowered on comment votes. I'm assuming that the new formula uses the popularity/value of all votes on what is published here then to award payout? The payouts all seem fine on my posts voted for, which all for the most part have a way higher amount of vote value than the comments I vote on.
Oh! What good news and we are definitely connected, I just published trying to encourage our users to trust and continue to believe and create wonderful content on the chain, in addition to encouraging all members of the ecosystem. Thank you dear Rycharde for sharing and reporting, everything you share is valuable.
Good vibes.
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted by the @blurtcurator communal account,
You can request a vote every 12 hours from the #getupvote channel in the official Blurt Discord.Don't wait to join ,lots of good stuff happening there.
Congratulations, your post has been curated by @r2cornell
Also, find us on Discord (https://discord.gg/BAn2amn)
https://discord.gg/BAn2amn
thanks for details ! :) 💙
What we see now in this blurt UI is not the HF5 ! ok ok !
how does this affect TOTAL TOKEN DISTRIBUTION per cycle ?