Blurt Economic Indicators - 20 June 2021

in blurt •  4 years ago 

My weekly look at Blurt's economic indicators.

All rises and falls are relative to last week.

Blurt Economic Indicators

BLURT Supply = 424.6 million
Vested BLURT = 49.8% (-0.2)

Reward Pool = 2.25 million BLURT (rising)
Recent Claims = 67.2 TRshares (falling)

Vote Yield upper estimate (500k BP) = 61.8% APR (rising)
Vote Yield lower estimate (500 BP) = 61.0% APR (rising)

Vote Yield estimate (100k BP) = 61.2% APR

Author/Curation Yield lower estimate = 30.6% APR (half of the Vote Yield)

You can also see the raw numbers on a blockchain explorer.

Insights

I promised in the past that I would drop the lower and upper estimates as they are now very close together, so shall henceforth use the new estimate, using an account with 100k BP. The difference across accounts is now only 1-2%, so it is easier to use just one number.

We continue to see the metrics change fairly quickly since HF6, as expected, with the upper yield estimate rising from 48.0% to 54.6% to 61.8%. All as predicted.

Now that HF7 has activate author rewards being paid 25% in liquid BLURT, I would expect to see the percentage of vested BLURT slowly fall - unless some meaningful new powering-up takes place - and, indeed, we are seeing the first signs of the vested percentage dropping slightly.

As @lazerlazer asked an interesting question, let me repeat my reply. The vested percentage on Hive is about 33% and on Steem 30% - both much lower than Blurt. The calculation is slightly complicated as they both have a non-vested second currency. Ignoring the HBD/SBD virtual supply, those numbers rise slightly to about 36% for Hive and 33% for Steem.

These low vesting rates across the Graphene chains have always been the reason that the vote-yields can be so much higher than the minting rate. The minting presses are churning out coins into an already saturated market. This is precisely why I added a feedback to the reward pool for Blurt that now responds to the actual active Blurt. The effect will be slow, as it is a slow-moving metric, but it means rewards will rise and fall as the vesting rate rises and falls - this is on top of the faster reaction to recent claims that depend on posting and voting.

Comparisons

As I've said before, such yields at the moment are higher than many defi swap pools - and without the danger of "impermanent losses". With BLURT coin prices being so low, this is also a good time to increase one's Blurt Power and accumulate for a future rise.

A comparison with the other Graphene chains done using the DLease delegation rates.

Steem DLease rates: max 31.3% APR (average 24.7%)
Hive DLease rates: max 13.8% APR (average 10.4%)

Those rates have always tracked the profitability of each chain and have the advantage of being one simple number.

Although Vote Yields are expressed in terms of financial returns, they are also fundamental expressions of the level of activity on each chain relative to the coin minting rate.

Hive will undergo HF25 on 30th June; it seems to me this will affect the curation-maximising algorithms and hence I expect the lease rates to possibly decrease, although this also depends on how the whole economy then reacts.

As we don't seem to have a functioning price feed on the explorers, these price snapshots may also help users decide where to trade BLURT.

Ionomy/Probit: 8/10 sats/BLURT (approx $0.0032)
Hive-Engine: 0.009/11 HIVE/BLURT (approx $0.0030)

The HIVE market appears to be the most active and the most volatile, so these are numbers for the current price range and best conversion to USD.

I hope these numbers will give members some insights into how the Blurt economic system is managed and, more importantly, how each individual user can both benefit from and affect the whole chain.


Please vote for my witness account @busbecq.
Can be done directly here.
A witness is more than a machine.
Thanks!


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  4 years ago  ·  

So it looks like the new formula had exactly the intended effect. It brought the vote yield of small accounts up to the same as that of the big accounts. So we're all around 61% now compared to the huge disparity from before.

That's awesome!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Thank you!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Nice post. And i think you were on point when saying we needed to wait a few weeks to let the reward percentage to work its self out. I think that if we can remove the psychology of thee false reporting of double the rewards of before HF6 we are on basically an even keel now. And with HF7 it is much more investor friendly. Maybe something to think about for the curator side also because that is where we will see more outside investors in the future.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Thank you very much for your work!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Congratulations, your post has been curated by @scilwa. Also, find us on Discord

Manually curated by @abiga554

logo3 Discord.png

Felicitaciones, su publication ha sido votado por @r2cornell. También, encuéntranos en Discord

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Also do you think Hive's new HBD interest is going to have anything to cause more unvesting to sell into HBD?

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

The HBD interest isn't new. What's new is that interest will only be paid on HBD that is in the savings instead of being paid on all the HBD.

But I think a lot of people didn't know about the interest on HBD before, and they might start holding more HBD in their savings now that they know about it.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

It hasn't been on while I was using it so it's new to me(and I assume to a lot of other users). Why was HBD not ported over to Blurt?

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

It was one of the founding ideas, that SBD was overly complex, very few users even understood what it did, and hence was removed to simplify the economy.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Complex, but still has its use. A stable coin is very useful on stuff like payment. Looking at the Hive DAO, you can see that if it was being paid in Hive, some people could be way over or underpaid depending on when they created the proposal.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

And there's the rub - it isn't a stablecoin. lmao
Words are not code - lots of words but wasn't designed as a stablecoin. If you read the whitepaper it was designed as a debt to steem, which is how it functions - which is the part the freaks people out! Hence, is complex only coz most users don't understand what it does - seems like most devs don't either ;-)

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Vested blurt is already going down with liquid payout. It'll probably continue to go down. I'm wondering if it'll reach Hive/Steem levels.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

In theory, all the chains can end up with near-zero vests! In terms of process, I designed some economic changes to the reward pool that will slow that down.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Awesome thanks. Will be interesting to see how that goes.

Thank you for such a detailed analysis. Things are positive for Blurt indeed! It's just a matter of time.
A good time to power up and grab on Blurt at such a sweet price.
Blurt On!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Sure, thanks!

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

interesting analysis ..

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Any chance you can also get distribution of BlurtPower vs the same on Steem and Hive? It would be nice to know where the wealth is concentrated on each chain.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

You can use the richlist https://ecosynthesizer.com/blurt/richlist
ecosynth also works on other chains.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

It doesn't seem to load at all. I tried it last time and its what got me to wonder about it.

these are interesting data, thanks for sharing

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Saludos, yo apenas estoy comprendiendo sobre estos asuntos. Por lo cual, saber alguna información como esta es excelente para quienes estamos iniciando, aun cuando pueda parecernos algo profunda para nuestro conocimientos.

  ·  4 years ago  ·  

Gracias por compartir tu publicación en #Blurt. Tu esfuerzo significa mucho para nosotros; por eso has recibido un voto positivo.

Te invito a votar por @blurtlatam como Testigo / Witness

1