RE: Burn DAO FUNDS Renewed Proposal

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Burn DAO FUNDS Renewed Proposal

in blurt •  last year 

Hey buddy, I have a hypothetical question (no one sending me, no ones interest that I represent - It's just me here!):

Imagine you had a DAO proposal with a token amount 'x' per day at your service, would you responsibly manage and distribute the funds to some developers, that are in need of it (khrom, easmael, nalexadre etc...)?

Would this be an option for you? Looking forward to your answer buddy! 🍀

Peace! 🙏

blurt
last year by
10.57 BLURT
  • Past Payouts 10.57 BLURT
  • - Author 5.28 BP
  • - Curators 5.28 BP
1 votes $0.02
2
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  last year  ·   (edited)

    I am not against funding interesting proposals, I am against funding them from two sources

    I see two options. Megadrive should choose one of them. I prefer first one

    • burning fake stake and funding everything through proposal system
    • getting rid of DAO and delegating fake stake to developers, curation groups and regional/county/language leaders

    management token would be useful in option two, thanks to it investors could vote for proposals that can receive delegation


    Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

    13.28 BLURT
    • Past Payouts 13.28 BLURT
    • - Author 9.41 BP
    • - Curators 3.87 BP
    2 votes    $0.04
    [-]
      ·  last year  ·  

    Ok, thanks for the answer. 👍🏽Maybe it will be seen..? 🤷‍♂️

    0.00 BLURT
      $0.00