RE: Tekraze

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Tekraze

in blurt •  2 years ago  (edited)

We have 5 Front ends don’t we ?

Maybe @Ctime, Double-u, mmmkkk, phusionphil, lucylin, fervi, jerkoff be given one to run …

And @megadrive and others have another one, or 4 since they created them all ?

Blurt.blog
Blurt.one
Blurt.live
Blurt.buzz
Blurt Latam ?

Or create a new one called Blurt.Free or something where the people who want completely Free Speech including Hate Speech and Anarchy can live …

Maybe people that are toxic to each other can simply choose which Front end to use ?

And the toxic people can be muted on each Front end … or keep open ?

Whatever.

There are lots of Options.

This way people will use the front end they want ?

Free speech or Free Speech with limits ?

Complete Anarchy or some Governance and rules ?

Both could thrive. Both could use Blurt and never have to see or hear each other.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

I don't think it's a good idea to label people as toxic, they are people too, and I think that there should be lots and lots of front ends and that the owner of those front-end interfaces, which represent private enterprise, should do with them as they choose to do.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Toxic to each other… sometimes people just can’t get along.

Yeah that is true. But that's not actually the reason to have lots of front ends. In my opinion the reason to have lots of front ends is to ensure that this is a resilient platform. Everybody should keep in mind that Ricardo and I can get hit by a bus anytime. That would be bad. This front end would die.

Blurt does not need to die with us.

I also think that the more meaningfully decentralized we make blurt, the more likely it is that value accrual will occur.