Well, we know from other platforms that high stake doesnt necessarily make one a quality curator. What if you earned from your stake directly from 50% of the pool and the other 50% went towards votes?
RE: RFC: Rewards
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RFC: Rewards
Great thoughts again imho. However firstly i have a problem with bringing quality into a discussion relating to things like social media, art, taste, thinking etc. Considering that quality (art, thought) is not absolute and is in the eye of the beholder, ie. what i think is quality (thought, art etc) u may find utter rubbish and vv. Secondly i personally feel that reward is a much secondary concern when blurting, i mean it's just wonderful one might earn a reward and that will hopefully encourage more blurting. Whether a piece of BLURT (art, report or a thought etc) represents quality and earns good rewards can and will in the end imho only remain a mystery no matter how much one tries to game it. Hence if quality (art, thought) is a mystery then one can never game it and i happen 2 think quality is a mystery indeed