Just a heads-up to Blurt that Norton have logged my blog as 'malicious'. I'm not sure if it is specifically my blog on blurt or if it's the whole of Blurt, someone should investigate further.
I was alerted to this by one of my FB followers who said he had to turn off his 'anti-virus' to access my anti-virus blog.
Do these people think my anti-virus posts are talking about them too? Hahahaha
The ironey is I do not use anti-virus software as it is just as much a scam as the viruses in the 3D world.
But seriously, this is libel surely?
Can I sue?
Hopefully this kind of thing only deters the normies who wouldn't believe a word I say anyway. Those with half a brain will ignore Norton as much as they ignore fact-checkers.
I would consider myself 'anti-virus hardware'. Can anti-virus software defeat anti-virus hardware?
Back in the good ole days of being a vaccine abolishionist we had the 'red button' scheme in which all the websites warning of vaccine damage or even those who debinked the olg global warming hockey-stick nonsense, were flagged up with a red button alert on SEARCH ENGINES like google.
No-one in their right mind uses google any more so I guess it's now the job of software like Norton who will go the same way as google. Norton is like the remdesivir of the computing world.
FYI if you switch from microsoft to Ubuntu there is no need for anti-viral software coz just like Gates did with his fake plandemics he'd already worked fake virus threats into his operating system. He knows how to make money out of fake threats.
Just like the scamdemic - no actual virus required - just the warning of one to scare people away from... reading!!
I would ask others to access blurt and see what their censor-browser says.
I would say it is a false positive. However, as I have not used antivirus for some time I cannot deny or affirm this. But it is an alert that I will try to replicate to find out the reason for this alert.
To replicate would be easy, write a blog on here, and put a link to it on fakebook, ask people if they can see it on there.
go on then. You've got a fb account. I'd be interested to know if its just me or whole of blurt.
I wonder if my wordpress is blocked too? https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/
Come to think of it I have posted other peoples blurts on fb but not had this told to me until now.
I heard the guy who takes care of Neil Youngs Garden has threatened to pull his actifit/Splinterlands blog from Blurt if they don't de-platform you here at Blurt. He said it's either his actifit posts or your anti science posts, there isn't room for both.
If he ends up leaving us, be prepared for the crash of the coin as he liquidates his 129 Blurt and makes his stand on the moral high ground.
On a more serious note, I also have never had an issue visiting your blog either. Perhaps Blackrock is a majority owner of Norton among its many holdings.
Hahahaha you almost had me there, ya minx
I can see them fine.
yes u said u use linux so you would. It's the normies who use microsoft and norton who can't
I need to learn how to use Linux, although I will stay away from Ubuntu. It's not opensource and they have a history of spying on their users and even bringing companies like Amazon into the mix. It seems to me that the corporate spy machines decided to package up an easy to use version to capture those who want freedom while not being tech knowledgeable to do so and place it on the software of privacy while not being private at all.
https://thelinuxexp.com/Ubuntu-hate/
For what it's worth, my antivirus has no issues with Blurt and it does encounter issues from time to time elsewhere based on my activity.
Norton is famous for this issue. Here is a thread from 3 years ago when it was blocking the likes of Google and Fakebook as being fraudulent.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2149652-norton-blocking-legitimate-sites
This next link looks like it is from the other day and the complaint is from someone using Weebly for their website.
https://community.weebly.com/t5/eCommerce/Norton-has-flagged-my-entire-site-as-quot-Dangerous-Website/td-p/237015
Ok that's good to know I guess. Same old nonsense then. I think of Norton as kind of a dinosaur of the computing world anyway.
I also thought Ubuntu and Linux were the same thing. Shows how much I know.
Think of Ubuntu as someone like Gates took Linux, made some apps they bundle together for it that involves their private source codes, and release it to those who think they are escaping Gates and Windows for privacy. Yes, it runs on Linux, but it is packaged for our use for the same reasons Windows is. It takes advantage of those who think they found an easy to use out of the box system, yet it's not privacy friendly as one expects Linux to be.
Well I would go with ANYTHING as an alternative to microsoft shite.
Don't be to hasty. Thye have proven they will take anyones money (which would include Gates) since they take Amazons.
But Ubuntu is free? They're not taking MY money. If I boycotted every single thing that the evil elites have a hand in I'd have to go live on Mars, even then I'd not be rid of em.
And that is how they hook one. :)
The injections are free too but I sure as hell aint getting it.
Wanted to add, I'm not judging you. Just saying that you aren't using a privacy software as you had thought. They definitely are spying on you, and I wouldn't be surprised if Gates has a hand in there somewhere.
I use Linux, no anti virus required :-) And it is free.
yeh me too, I added that in at the end. How can a system based on microsoft not be susceptible to viruses when the original is? It's obvious innit.
Innit star :-)