Next year seems like it could be a big year for a lot of crypto. It would be sad if Blurt misses out because of community divisions. I really have nothing against burn posts if that's what the author really wants, they can choose any benefactor. I thought it was a little wierd to support only burn posts. Although I am glad to see people exercise freedom to use the token and express themself, I can see that some are still influenced purely by opportunity for an upvote. That's also their choice, but I'd rather see Blurt grow in other ways.
RE: "Burning" (Deleting) BLURT is a stupid fad
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"Burning" (Deleting) BLURT is a stupid fad
Like I said in the post, I think it's good people use their curation as a way to enact change. Broadcasting your intent to vote on particular subjects, or on authors from particular parts of the world, or even on authors who do (or don't) burn their rewards, is fair game.
You're right, community division isn't good. But one side has formed up... and I can't possibly join them, so I'm taking an opposition position. Hopefully things will be able to settle down into a sustainable and healthy pattern.