RE: @ctime's new approach to burning BLURT 🔥🔥🔥(BURN POST!)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

@ctime's new approach to burning BLURT 🔥🔥🔥(BURN POST!)

in blurt •  16 days ago 

My “Power up bonus” campaign has shown that only a few people are interested in increasing their Blurt Power. For this reason, I have changed the rules by which I vote, for a while now I vote only on “burn comments”, blurt.media and on posts shared on X.

Could curationcoconut do something similar? For example: if a post was shared on facebook then the vote could be higher?

These shares are very important, they improve the position of blurt.blog in search engines and can bring new users

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  15 days ago  ·  

@outofthematrix

For example: if a post was shared on facebook then the vote could be higher?

This is the path that large content curation accounts should follow. While it is true that burning helps, getting incentivized comments, reblogs also help the platform's economy.

Give 100% positive votes to posts that have comments, that publish or link to your posts on mastodon, x, facebook, instagram. This gives an added value, publicity and the way the platform economy is created, the fees that are generated contribute to a better price.

I will support the burn comments with both accounts outofthematrix and curationcoconut!!!!

I hope more whales will follow!!!

BTW: If there is a way to check if an account has powered down, let us say, in the past 3 months, then: NO UPVOTE... For example!

Very bad idea, don't forget we are not Hive. People should not be affraid to power down and sell their BLURT when they need money. What I don't like is this:

Untitled.png

We keep voting on accounts that are created by same person