All DPoS is either an intentionally ponzi scheme, or an unintentional one.
(and so are POW coins but with much less centralization control).
DPoS platforms - if an unintentional ponzi- are platforms run by leftist (libtarded) ideologues who have serious duning kruger issues and use 'muh collective' as a way to not take responsibility for the inevitable collpase to 0.
DPoS platforms - if an intentional ponzi - is a ponzi (also run by the parastical, libtarded mindset)
Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?
(if not, why not?)
By proactively tackling these issues, Blurt can improve its chances of success in the competitive landscape of social media and blockchain technology.
...these platform will not grow, because people with more intelligence than the designers, see what's really going on. (merit not rewarded, but sycophancy, is)
'proactively' requires a complete change in ideology/mindset.
In the 6 or 7 years on blockchain, I see not one tiny little bit of evidence of this shift.