Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Yeah but once they move the funds it’s too late there is nothing we can do, the funds can also be used for voting on consensus which could be a risk, their keys could get compromised if they close down due to bear market conditions or regulation and suddenly you have a blackhat with keys to large sums of blurt to mess with consensus.

  ·  2 years ago  ·   (edited)

the courts are responsible for enforcing the law

you are not responsible for enforcing the law

the scenario you describe "blackhat with keys" could happen at any moment

regardless of what happens with these unclaimed exchange tokens

that's why it is important to maintain neutrality and focus on stability


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

In this case code is law and consensus witnesses are the enforcers. This is a community matter and governance can act in the interests of the community, those who don’t agree with governance decisions can support a different fork.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

ok, either that

or continue to engage in conversations on the topic


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

The exchange burn idea currently has alot of support

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

any word on which witnesses are the least enthusiastic ?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com